H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Linda Wild vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 2-0
Linda Wild holds a 2–0 lead over Marianne Werdel Witmeyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Linda Wild leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Linda Wild won the 1994 Lucerne third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 1994* | Lucerne | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Linda Wild | 7-5 6-2 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
| Feb 24, 1994* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Linda Wild | 6-4 6-4 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linda Wild | #252 | #23 | 823 | 1,823 | 135 | 146 | 48.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Linda Wild | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #155 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #41 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #49 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #49 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #58 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,817 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #223 | 1,629 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,570 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,543 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |