H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Linda Wild vs Natalia Baudone H2H: 2-1
Linda Wild holds a 2–1 lead over Natalia Baudone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Linda Wild leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Linda Wild won the 1994 Singapore third round 6-4 3-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 1994* | Singapore | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Linda Wild | 6-4 3-6 7-6 | Natalia Baudone | Match data |
| May 27, 1993* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Natalia Baudone | 4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | Linda Wild | Match data |
| May 29, 1991* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Linda Wild | 6-4 7-5 | Natalia Baudone | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linda Wild | #252 | #23 | 823 | 1,823 | 135 | 146 | 48.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Natalia Baudone | #934 | #71 | 126 | 1,682 | 38 | 58 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Linda Wild | Natalia Baudone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #224 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #155 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #101 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #41 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #49 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #96 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #49 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #58 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,817 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #223 | 1,629 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,570 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,543 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |