H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Linda Wild vs Nicole Arendt H2H: 0-1
Nicole Arendt holds a 1–0 lead over Linda Wild in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicole Arendt leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nicole Arendt won the 1997 Birmingham second round 6-3 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 56
Left-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 1997* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Nicole Arendt | 6-3 4-6 6-2 | Linda Wild | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linda Wild | #252 | #23 | 823 | 1,823 | 135 | 146 | 48.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Nicole Arendt | #433 | #49 | 487 | 1,776 | 67 | 75 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Linda Wild | Nicole Arendt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 1 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #155 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #41 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1992 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #49 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #218 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #49 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #88 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #58 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #73 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,817 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #117 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #223 | 1,629 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #79 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #63 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,570 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,543 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #143 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #433 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |