H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Linda Wild vs Pam Shriver H2H: 3-2

Linda Wild holds a 3–2 lead over Pam Shriver in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on carpet, while Linda Wild leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Linda Wild won the 1996 Oakland fourth round 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Linda Wild
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 8, 1996* Oakland WTA 250 R16 Carpet Linda Wild #33 6-3 6-0 Pam Shriver #229 Match data
Nov 3, 1995* Oakland WTA 250 R16 Carpet Linda Wild #61 6-7 7-5 7-6 Pam Shriver #144 Match data
Feb 9, 1995* Chicago WTA 250 R32 Carpet Pam Shriver #91 4-6 7-5 6-3 Linda Wild #50 Match data
Jan 18, 1995* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Linda Wild #48 6-3 6-0 Pam Shriver #62 Match data
Feb 17, 1990* Chicago WTA 1000 QF Carpet Pam Shriver #20 6-1 6-2 Linda Wild #154 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Linda Wild #252 #23 823 1,823 135 146 48.0% 0 1 0 0 4 5
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Linda Wild Pam Shriver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,849 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,798 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1980 47–21 69.1% — 2,027 0 2
18 1989 1–7 12.5% #155 1,457 0 0 1981 58–25 69.9% — 2,122 0 4
19 1990 9–12 42.9% #86 1,549 0 0 1982 47–19 71.2% — 2,087 0 5
20 1991 20–19 51.3% #41 1,720 0 0 1983 52–15 77.6% — 2,161 0 8
21 1992 19–21 47.5% #49 1,733 0 0 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10
22 1993 24–18 57.1% #45 1,764 0 2 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14
23 1994 20–19 51.3% #49 1,741 0 2 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16
24 1995 17–13 56.7% #58 1,758 0 4 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20
25 1996 22–16 57.9% #29 1,817 0 5 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24
26 1997 3–14 17.6% #223 1,629 0 5 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24
27 — — — — — — — 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24
28 1999 0–3 0.0% #191 1,570 0 5 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24
29 2000 0–3 0.0% #252 1,543 0 5 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24
30 — — — — — — — 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24
31 — — — — — — — 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24
32 — — — — — — — 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24
33 — — — — — — — 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24
34 — — — — — — — 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24