H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Linda Wild vs Rosalyn Fairbank H2H: 4-0

Linda Wild holds a 4–0 lead over Rosalyn Fairbank in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Linda Wild leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Linda Wild won the 1994 Chicago round of 32 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Linda Wild
USA Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main-draw meetings
Rosalyn Fairbank
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Linda Wild #50 6-3 6-4 Rosalyn Fairbank #58 Match data Feb 10, 1994* R32 Chicago Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Linda Wild #64 6-1 6-3 Rosalyn Fairbank #85 Match data Jun 20, 1992* SF Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Linda Wild #51 1-6 6-1 7-6 Rosalyn Fairbank #99 Match data Apr 8, 1992* R64 Amelia Island Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Linda Wild #58 2-6 6-4 6-3 Rosalyn Fairbank #87 Match data Nov 7, 1991* R32 Oakland Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Linda Wild #252 #23 823 1,815 135 146 48.0% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Rosalyn Fairbank #325 #15 51 1,932 336 309 52.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Linda Wild Rosalyn Fairbank
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0 1978 3–2 60.0% — 1,539 0 0
1989 1–7 12.5% #155 1,457 0 0 1979 17–10 63.0% — 1,723 0 0
1990 9–12 42.9% #86 1,554 0 0 1980 22–20 52.4% — 1,677 0 0
1991 20–19 51.3% #41 1,720 0 0 1981 15–22 40.5% — 1,656 0 0
1992 19–21 47.5% #49 1,732 0 0 1982 32–21 60.4% — 1,897 0 0
1993 24–18 57.1% #45 1,764 0 2 1983 24–19 55.8% — 1,918 0 1
1994 20–19 51.3% #49 1,740 0 2 1984 22–26 45.8% #32 1,766 0 1
1995 17–13 56.7% #58 1,758 0 4 1985 28–23 54.9% #38 1,806 0 1
1996 22–16 57.9% #29 1,809 0 5 1986 23–20 53.5% #28 1,824 0 1
1997 3–14 17.6% #223 1,625 0 5 1987 21–20 51.2% #36 1,755 0 1
1999 0–3 0.0% #191 1,566 0 5 1988 27–22 55.1% #37 1,772 0 1
2000 0–3 0.0% #252 1,540 0 5 1989 27–18 60.0% #22 1,845 0 1
— — — — — — — 1990 26–20 56.5% #24 1,787 0 1
— — — — — — — 1991 14–19 42.4% #90 1,637 0 1
— — — — — — — 1992 16–16 50.0% #46 1,726 0 1
— — — — — — — 1993 17–19 47.2% #63 1,766 0 1
— — — — — — — 1994 0–4 0.0% #284 1,704 0 1
— — — — — — — 1995 2–8 20.0% #261 1,598 0 1

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Linda Wild Rosalyn Fairbank
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1972 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1978 — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
1989 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — —
1990 3 6 9 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1980 3 6 9 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 3 6 50.0%
1991 8 9 17 47.1% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1981 3 4 7 42.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 9 13 30.8%
1992 8 10 18 44.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1982 7 3 10 70.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 5 8 13 38.5%
1993 15 9 24 62.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 1983 3 4 7 42.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 11 6 17 64.7% 8 4 12 66.7%
1994 9 11 20 45.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 1984 8 7 15 53.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 8 7 15 53.3% 4 7 11 36.4%
1995 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 1985 13 11 24 54.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 3 3 6 50.0%
1996 15 10 25 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1986 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 7 14 50.0%
1997 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1987 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1988 11 11 22 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 2 4 50.0%
2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 6 8 14 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 5 3 8 62.5%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 13 9 22 59.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 6 11 45.5%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 9 10 19 47.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 7 6 13 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 9 11 20 45.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 70 79 149 47.0% 19 30 49 38.8% 19 19 38 50.0% 27 18 45 60.0% Career 109 110 219 49.8% 44 51 95 46.3% 128 76 204 62.7% 51 70 121 42.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Linda Wild Rosalyn Fairbank
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1972 1493 98.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.09 1978 1539 104.5 — — — — — — +66 75.0% +0.75 — 2–0 — +0.38
1989 1457 103.4 — — — — +30 — — 17.6% -2.06 0–1 — — -0.09 1979 1724 136.7 — — — — — -159 -3 61.3% +1.02 4–4 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 101.5 +0.70
1990 1555 123.6 — — — — +1 -3 — 43.2% -0.52 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 104.4 -0.32 1980 1678 128.5 — — — — -83 -36 +37 52.1% +0.08 6–8 (43%) 1–0 — -0.49
1991 1721 134.6 — — — — -71 -49 -115 50.0% -0.26 8–4 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 107.4 -0.67 1981 1657 122.8 — — — — -41 +16 +48 40.7% -0.51 7–5 (58%) 2–3 (40%) 103.2 +0.67
1992 1733 139.7 — — — — -89 -75 +45 47.8% -0.05 6–6 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 103.9 -1.52 1982 1897 150.2 — — — — -180 -228 +28 57.5% +0.52 9–7 (56%) 5–3 (63%) 105.2 -2.75
1993 1765 132.8 — — — — +27 -174 -41 56.4% +0.47 7–5 (58%) 3–4 (43%) 99.5 +0.50 1983 1919 136.6 — — — — -79 -271 +29 53.1% +0.19 7–3 (70%) 1–4 (20%) 101.2 -2.11
1994 1741 132.8 — — — — -38 -164 +80 51.6% -0.05 8–9 (47%) 6–4 (60%) 98.6 -1.90 1984 1767 136.1 — — — — +21 -164 +101 46.8% +0.05 7–8 (47%) 3–8 (27%) 94.2 +0.03
1995 1758 128.9 — — — — +19 -201 +14 58.0% +0.57 3–6 (33%) 4–4 (50%) 96.1 +1.45 1985 1806 136.7 — — — — -14 -143 +37 51.3% +0.09 9–4 (69%) 9–2 (82%) 109.3 -1.60
1996 1810 144.4 — — — — +25 -227 -22 55.2% +0.55 7–6 (54%) 6–8 (43%) 101.6 +0.67 1986 1824 142.9 — — — — +15 -154 -17 52.5% +0.05 8–7 (53%) 5–4 (56%) 102.0 -2.16
1997 1625 106.2 — — — — +96 -90 +72 25.6% -2.15 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 95.7 +0.19 1987 1756 134.7 — — — — -60 -105 +159 50.0% +0.03 8–6 (57%) 5–1 (83%) 103.9 -0.46
1999 1567 91.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.38 1988 1772 141.1 — — — — -53 -160 +181 56.0% +0.38 7–11 (39%) 8–5 (62%) 98.3 +0.48
2000 1541 109.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.42 1989 1845 147.2 — — — — -106 -205 +177 57.8% +0.54 7–5 (58%) 6–8 (43%) 101.7 -0.49
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1787 137.3 — — — — -6 — +236 51.9% +0.13 11–3 (79%) 5–2 (71%) 108.9 +0.60
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1637 127.7 — — — — +34 -74 +316 46.1% -0.10 3–7 (30%) 1–5 (17%) 88.8 +1.07
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1726 133.0 — — — — -39 -176 +270 51.5% -0.04 3–3 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 100.5 -1.50
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1766 146.5 — — — — -14 -176 +196 45.3% -0.44 9–5 (64%) 5–4 (56%) 104.6 -2.22
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1704 104.2 — — — — -15 — — 0.0% -3.63 — — — -0.30
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1599 97.0 — — — — +23 — +239 15.8% -2.47 0–1 — — +0.12
Career 1816 137.3 — — — — -7 -98 +18 48.5% -0.14 43–42 (51%) 31–29 (52%) 102.2 -0.65 Career 1932 143.7 — — — — -36 -134 +112 51.1% +0.09 105–87 (55%) 65–57 (53%) 105.0 -1.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.