H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Linda Wild vs Rosalyn Fairbank H2H: 4-0
Linda Wild holds a 4–0 lead over Rosalyn Fairbank in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Linda Wild leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Linda Wild won the 1994 Chicago third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 65
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 1994* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Linda Wild | 6-3 6-4 | Rosalyn Fairbank | Match data |
| Jun 20, 1992* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | SF | Grass | Linda Wild | 6-1 6-3 | Rosalyn Fairbank | Match data |
| Apr 8, 1992* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Linda Wild | 1-6 6-1 7-6 | Rosalyn Fairbank | Match data |
| Nov 7, 1991* | Oakland | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Linda Wild | 2-6 6-4 6-3 | Rosalyn Fairbank | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linda Wild | #252 | #23 | 823 | 1,823 | 135 | 146 | 48.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Rosalyn Fairbank | #325 | #15 | 51 | 1,933 | 336 | 309 | 52.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Linda Wild | Rosalyn Fairbank | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 1 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #155 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 17–10 | 63.0% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 22–20 | 52.4% | — | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #41 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 15–22 | 40.5% | — | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #49 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 1,904 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 24–19 | 55.8% | — | 1,920 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1994 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #49 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #32 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1995 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #58 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #38 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,817 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #28 | 1,824 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1997 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #223 | 1,629 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #36 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #37 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,570 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,846 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2000 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,543 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #24 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #90 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #63 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #261 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |