H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Linda Wild vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 1-2

Sandra Cecchini holds a 2–1 lead over Linda Wild in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sandra Cecchini leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Linda Wild won the 1996 Roland Garros round of 64 6-7(5) 7-6(3) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Linda Wild
USA Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Linda Wild #33 6-7(5) 7-6(3) 6-2 Sandra Cecchini #127 Match data May 30, 1996* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Sandra Cecchini #33 6-3 5-7 6-3 Linda Wild #42 Match data Mar 25, 1993* R32 Houston Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Sandra Cecchini #29 3-6 6-3 6-3 Linda Wild #52 Match data Apr 16, 1992* R32 Houston Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Linda Wild #252 #23 823 1,815 135 146 48.0% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,936 300 217 58.0% 0 0 0 2 9 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Linda Wild Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
1989 1–7 12.5% #155 1,457 0 0 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,484 0 0
1990 9–12 42.9% #86 1,554 0 0 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,496 0 0
1991 20–19 51.3% #41 1,720 0 0 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
1992 19–21 47.5% #49 1,732 0 0 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
1993 24–18 57.1% #45 1,764 0 2 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,633 0 3
1994 20–19 51.3% #49 1,740 0 2 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,859 0 5
1995 17–13 56.7% #58 1,758 0 4 1988 34–15 69.4% #21 1,843 0 7
1996 22–16 57.9% #29 1,809 0 5 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
1997 3–14 17.6% #223 1,625 0 5 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,814 0 9
1999 0–3 0.0% #191 1,566 0 5 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,773 0 10
2000 0–3 0.0% #252 1,540 0 5 1992 24–16 60.0% #34 1,823 0 11
— — — — — — — 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,726 0 11
— — — — — — — 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
— — — — — — — 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
— — — — — — — 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,628 0 11
— — — — — — — 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,608 0 11
— — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,555 0 11

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Linda Wild Sandra Cecchini
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1972 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1989 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
1990 3 6 9 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1983 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
1991 8 9 17 47.1% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1984 12 4 16 75.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
1992 8 10 18 44.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1985 6 7 13 46.2% 15 8 23 65.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
1993 15 9 24 62.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
1994 9 11 20 45.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 1987 8 4 12 66.7% 26 10 36 72.2% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
1995 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 29 8 37 78.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
1996 15 10 25 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1989 1 2 3 33.3% 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
1997 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 21 9 30 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 21 11 32 65.6% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 3 3 6 50.0% 15 10 25 60.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 3 2 5 60.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — —
Career 70 79 149 47.0% 19 30 49 38.8% 19 19 38 50.0% 27 18 45 60.0% Career 40 42 82 48.8% 236 140 376 62.8% 3 8 11 27.3% 21 26 47 44.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Linda Wild Sandra Cecchini
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1972 1493 98.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.09 1981 1478 96.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.07
1989 1457 103.4 — — — — +30 — — 17.6% -2.06 0–1 — — -0.09 1982 1484 101.9 — — — — — +37 — 44.4% +0.11 1–0 — — +0.65
1990 1555 123.6 — — — — +1 -3 — 43.2% -0.52 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 104.4 -0.32 1983 1497 106.6 — — — — — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 — — +0.17
1991 1721 134.6 — — — — -71 -49 -115 50.0% -0.26 8–4 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 107.4 -0.67 1984 1651 123.3 — — — — +49 -79 -56 53.9% +0.38 5–7 (42%) 1–3 (25%) 96.6 +2.06
1992 1733 139.7 — — — — -89 -75 +45 47.8% -0.05 6–6 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 103.9 -1.52 1985 1747 132.3 — — — — -80 +43 — 51.1% -0.19 8–4 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 109.7 +0.71
1993 1765 132.8 — — — — +27 -174 -41 56.4% +0.47 7–5 (58%) 3–4 (43%) 99.5 +0.50 1986 1633 120.0 — — — — -65 +149 — 43.2% -0.53 4–4 (50%) 0–3 (0%) 96.0 +0.42
1994 1741 132.8 — — — — -38 -164 +80 51.6% -0.05 8–9 (47%) 6–4 (60%) 98.6 -1.90 1987 1859 148.1 — — — — -141 +79 — 66.7% +1.10 7–6 (54%) 6–2 (75%) 103.4 +0.44
1995 1758 128.9 — — — — +19 -201 +14 58.0% +0.57 3–6 (33%) 4–4 (50%) 96.1 +1.45 1988 1843 145.8 — — — — -149 +157 — 64.2% +1.10 9–2 (82%) 5–2 (71%) 107.7 +2.46
1996 1810 144.4 — — — — +25 -227 -22 55.2% +0.55 7–6 (54%) 6–8 (43%) 101.6 +0.67 1989 1799 128.9 — — — — -134 +134 — 59.4% +0.59 13–7 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 99.8 +3.27
1997 1625 106.2 — — — — +96 -90 +72 25.6% -2.15 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 95.7 +0.19 1990 1815 140.5 — — — — -136 +130 — 60.0% +0.83 10–5 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 +0.82
1999 1567 91.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.38 1991 1774 131.6 — — — — -138 +151 — 61.3% +0.68 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 100.3 +1.96
2000 1541 109.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.42 1992 1824 136.5 — — — — -222 +141 — 55.6% +0.29 8–2 (80%) 4–2 (67%) 107.8 +0.11
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1727 129.9 — — — — -151 +131 — 53.9% +0.20 5–5 (50%) 7–1 (88%) 101.3 -0.35
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1841 138.9 — — — — -123 +6 — 57.0% +0.51 14–5 (74%) 1–5 (17%) 101.9 +0.57
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1661 113.4 — — — — +36 +34 — 40.7% -0.54 4–4 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 95.9 +0.31
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1629 109.5 — — — — +14 +62 — 52.4% +0.05 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +1.57
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1608 106.4 — — — — — +32 — 39.1% -1.30 0–1 2–0 — -0.39
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1555 95.4 — — — — — +15 — 34.6% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.33
Career 1816 137.3 — — — — -7 -98 +18 48.5% -0.14 43–42 (51%) 31–29 (52%) 102.2 -0.65 Career 1936 137.9 — — — — -93 +97 -56 55.5% +0.35 98–62 (61%) 42–34 (55%) 106.0 +2.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.