H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Linda Wild vs Shaun Stafford H2H: 1-2
Shaun Stafford holds a 2–1 lead over Linda Wild in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Shaun Stafford leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Linda Wild leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Linda Wild won the 1995 Eastbourne second round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 57
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 1995* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Linda Wild | 7-5 6-2 | Shaun Stafford | Match data |
| Sep 1, 1994* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Shaun Stafford | 6-0 6-7 6-2 | Linda Wild | Match data |
| Nov 8, 1990* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Shaun Stafford | 6-1 6-2 | Linda Wild | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linda Wild | #252 | #23 | 823 | 1,823 | 135 | 146 | 48.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Shaun Stafford | #803 | #48 | 31 | 1,772 | 90 | 132 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Linda Wild | Shaun Stafford | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 1 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #155 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #121 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #41 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #51 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #49 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #150 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #102 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #49 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #68 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1995 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #58 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #74 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,817 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #55 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1997 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #223 | 1,629 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #97 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #388 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,570 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,543 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |