H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Linda Wild vs Yayuk Basuki H2H: 2-0
Linda Wild holds a 2–0 lead over Yayuk Basuki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Linda Wild leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Linda Wild won the 1996 Jakarta final W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
INA
Age 55
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 1996* | Jakarta | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Linda Wild | (w/o) | Yayuk Basuki | Match data |
| Sep 29, 1995* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Linda Wild | 6-0 7-5 | Yayuk Basuki | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linda Wild | #252 | #23 | 823 | 1,823 | 135 | 146 | 48.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Yayuk Basuki | #262 | #19 | 1,360 | 1,940 | 161 | 123 | 56.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Linda Wild | Yayuk Basuki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 1 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #155 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #41 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #35 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1992 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #49 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1993 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,723 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1994 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #49 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #29 | 1,788 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 1995 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #58 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1996 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,817 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #30 | 1,853 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1997 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #223 | 1,629 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #20 | 1,854 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #56 | 1,727 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,570 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,707 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2000 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,543 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #256 | 1,660 | 0 | 6 |