H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Lindsay Blachford vs Lindsey Beaven H2H: 0-4
Lindsey Beaven holds a 4–0 lead over Lindsay Blachford in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Lindsey Beaven leads 3–0 on grass and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lindsey Beaven won the 1975 Chichester fourth round 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 73
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 76
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 1975* | Chichester | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Lindsey Beaven | 6-1 6-0 | Lindsay Blachford | Match data |
| Jun 21, 1973* | London Rothmans | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Lindsey Beaven | 6-3 6-4 | Lindsay Blachford | Match data |
| May 5, 1973* | Sutton | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Lindsey Beaven | 6-8 6-3 6-2 | Lindsay Blachford | Match data |
| Jul 11, 1970* | Felixstowe | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Lindsey Beaven | 6-2 6-2 | Lindsay Blachford | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lindsay Blachford | — | — | — | 1,636 | 55 | 79 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lindsey Beaven | — | — | — | 1,738 | 121 | 133 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lindsay Blachford | Lindsey Beaven | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1970 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1971 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1972 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1973 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1974 | 10–16 | 38.5% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 17–13 | 56.7% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1975 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1976 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 29–20 | 59.2% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 15–21 | 41.7% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 26–23 | 53.1% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,573 | 0 | 8 |