H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Lindsay Davenport vs Amy Frazier H2H: 10-0
Lindsay Davenport holds a 10–0 lead over Amy Frazier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 6–0 on hard courts and 3–0 on carpet. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2004 Los Angeles fourth round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
10
–
0
10 main draw meetings
USA
Age 53
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2004* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-2 6-4 | Amy Frazier | Match data |
| Jul 31, 2003* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-3 6-1 | Amy Frazier | Match data |
| Sep 25, 1999* | Tokyo | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-2 6-1 | Amy Frazier | Match data |
| Sep 5, 1999* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-1 6-1 | Amy Frazier | Match data |
| Jul 31, 1999* | Stanford | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-0 6-4 | Amy Frazier | Match data |
| May 23, 1999* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | SF | Clay | Lindsay Davenport | 6-0 6-2 | Amy Frazier | Match data |
| Nov 14, 1998* | Philadelphia | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Lindsay Davenport | 5-7 6-3 6-3 | Amy Frazier | Match data |
| Mar 8, 1998* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-3 6-1 | Amy Frazier | Match data |
| Nov 8, 1996* | Oakland | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Lindsay Davenport | 6-1 6-4 | Amy Frazier | Match data |
| Feb 11, 1994* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Lindsay Davenport | 6-3 7-5 | Amy Frazier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lindsay Davenport | #35 | #1 | 6,100 | 2,353 | 704 | 190 | 78.7% | 3 | 13 | 1 | 25 | 12 | 54 |
| Amy Frazier | #450 | #13 | 1,381 | 1,959 | 416 | 307 | 57.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lindsay Davenport | Amy Frazier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #147 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #348 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #58 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1992 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #161 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #33 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1993 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #20 | 1,858 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #16 | 1,893 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1994 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #6 | 2,022 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,813 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1995 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #12 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #19 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1996 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #9 | 2,013 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #39 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1997 | 57–16 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,161 | 0 | 12 | 1994 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #16 | 1,903 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1998 | 68–14 | 82.9% | #1 | 2,283 | 1 | 18 | 1995 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #18 | 1,877 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1999 | 58–11 | 84.1% | #2 | 2,297 | 2 | 25 | 1996 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,835 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2000 | 56–13 | 81.2% | #2 | 2,228 | 3 | 29 | 1997 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,818 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2001 | 64–10 | 86.5% | #1 | 2,275 | 3 | 36 | 1998 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #42 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2002 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #12 | 2,153 | 3 | 36 | 1999 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #19 | 1,876 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2003 | 48–15 | 76.2% | #5 | 2,076 | 3 | 37 | 2000 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #20 | 1,852 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2004 | 64–10 | 86.5% | #1 | 2,203 | 3 | 44 | 2001 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,695 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2005 | 58–11 | 84.1% | #1 | 2,199 | 3 | 50 | 2002 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #39 | 1,757 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2006 | 21–8 | 72.4% | #25 | 2,122 | 3 | 50 | 2003 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #61 | 1,746 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2007 | 13–1 | 92.9% | #72 | 2,147 | 3 | 52 | 2004 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #26 | 1,828 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 2008 | 23–6 | 79.3% | #35 | 2,063 | 3 | 54 | 2005 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,730 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #130 | 1,626 | 0 | 8 |