H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Amy Frazier H2H: 10-0

Lindsay Davenport holds a 10–0 lead over Amy Frazier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 6–0 on hard courts and 3–0 on carpet. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2004 Los Angeles fourth round 6-2 6-4.

USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
10 0
10 main draw meetings
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 23, 2004* Los Angeles WTA 500 R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #5 6-2 6-4 Amy Frazier #23 Match data
Jul 31, 2003* San Diego WTA 500 R32 Hard Lindsay Davenport #5 6-3 6-1 Amy Frazier #40 Match data
Sep 25, 1999* Tokyo WTA 500 SF Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 6-2 6-1 Amy Frazier #22 Match data
Sep 5, 1999* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 6-1 6-1 Amy Frazier #24 Match data
Jul 31, 1999* Stanford WTA 250 SF Hard Lindsay Davenport #1 6-0 6-4 Amy Frazier #28 Match data
May 23, 1999* Madrid WTA 1000 SF Clay Lindsay Davenport #2 6-0 6-2 Amy Frazier #30 Match data
Nov 14, 1998* Philadelphia WTA 250 QF Carpet Lindsay Davenport #1 5-7 6-3 6-3 Amy Frazier #50 Match data
Mar 8, 1998* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 6-3 6-1 Amy Frazier #44 Match data
Nov 8, 1996* Oakland WTA 250 R16 Carpet Lindsay Davenport #6 6-1 6-4 Amy Frazier #29 Match data
Feb 11, 1994* Chicago WTA 250 R16 Carpet Lindsay Davenport #12 6-3 7-5 Amy Frazier #40 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Amy Frazier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8
33 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8