H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Lindsay Davenport vs Angeles Montolio H2H: 1-1
Lindsay Davenport and Angeles Montolio are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Angeles Montolio leads 1–0 on clay, while Lindsay Davenport leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2001 US Open third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 50
Right-Handed
157 cm / 5'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2001* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-3 6-2 | Angeles Montolio | Match data |
| Mar 25, 1994* | Houston | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Angeles Montolio | 6-3 6-4 | Lindsay Davenport | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lindsay Davenport | #35 | #1 | 6,100 | 2,353 | 704 | 190 | 78.7% | 3 | 13 | 1 | 25 | 12 | 54 |
| Angeles Montolio | #601 | #22 | 1,109 | 1,818 | 86 | 94 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lindsay Davenport | Angeles Montolio | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #348 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1992 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #161 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1993 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #20 | 1,858 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1994 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #6 | 2,022 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #103 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #12 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #172 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #9 | 2,013 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #110 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 57–16 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,161 | 0 | 12 | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #260 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 68–14 | 82.9% | #1 | 2,283 | 1 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1999 | 58–11 | 84.1% | #2 | 2,297 | 2 | 25 | 1999 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #60 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 56–13 | 81.2% | #2 | 2,228 | 3 | 29 | 2000 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #55 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 64–10 | 86.5% | #1 | 2,275 | 3 | 36 | 2001 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #23 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2002 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #12 | 2,153 | 3 | 36 | 2002 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #134 | 1,519 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2003 | 48–15 | 76.2% | #5 | 2,076 | 3 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2004 | 64–10 | 86.5% | #1 | 2,203 | 3 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2005 | 58–11 | 84.1% | #1 | 2,199 | 3 | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2006 | 21–8 | 72.4% | #25 | 2,122 | 3 | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2007 | 13–1 | 92.9% | #72 | 2,147 | 3 | 52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2008 | 23–6 | 79.3% | #35 | 2,063 | 3 | 54 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |