H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Ann Grossman H2H: 3-0

Lindsay Davenport holds a 3–0 lead over Ann Grossman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 1996 Key Biscayne fourth round 6-0 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Ann Grossman
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 25, 1996* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #12 6-0 6-2 Ann Grossman #68 Match data
Aug 5, 1994* San Diego WTA 500 R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #6 6-1 6-2 Ann Grossman #43 Match data
Jan 7, 1994* Brisbane WTA 500 R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #20 6-0 6-2 Ann Grossman #35 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Ann Grossman #343 #29 384 1,888 187 185 50.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Ann Grossman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0 1987 0–1 0.0% #378 1,497 0 0
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 1988 15–12 55.6% #48 1,699 0 0
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3 1989 23–20 53.5% #54 1,736 0 0
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4 1990 23–22 51.1% #50 1,749 0 0
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 1991 12–19 38.7% #89 1,636 0 0
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12 1992 23–17 57.5% #36 1,734 0 0
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 1993 30–19 61.2% #35 1,810 0 0
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25 1994 27–21 56.2% #37 1,853 0 0
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29 1995 12–19 38.7% #88 1,681 0 0
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36 1996 10–14 41.7% #72 1,664 0 0
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36 1997 10–17 37.0% #75 1,615 0 0
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37 1998 2–4 33.3% #283 1,595 0 0
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44 — — — — — — —
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50 — — — — — — —
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50 — — — — — — —
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52 — — — — — — —
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54 — — — — — — —