H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Anna Smashnova H2H: 3-0

Lindsay Davenport holds a 3–0 lead over Anna Smashnova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2002 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix round of 16 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Anna Smashnova
ISR Age 50 Right-Handed 157 cm / 5'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lindsay Davenport #7 6-4 6-3 Anna Smashnova #18 Match data Oct 11, 2002* R16 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Lindsay Davenport #2 6-0 6-1 Anna Smashnova #46 Match data Sep 24, 1999* R16 Toyota Princess Cup Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Lindsay Davenport #2 6-1 6-3 Anna Smashnova #38 Match data May 23, 1999* QF Madrid Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,374 711 191 78.8% 3 1 11 1 26 13 55
Anna Smashnova #994 #15 1,616 1,881 242 222 52.2% 0 0 0 0 0 12 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Anna Smashnova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1991 0–1 0.0% #264 1,491 0 0
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 1992 1–2 33.3% #236 1,489 0 0
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,512 0 0 1993 0–1 0.0% #139 1,485 0 0
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 1994 10–11 47.6% #47 1,600 0 0
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,041 0 3 1995 8–12 40.0% #68 1,577 0 0
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,964 0 4 1996 4–11 26.7% #132 1,562 0 0
20 1996 47–15 75.8% #9 2,065 0 7 — — — — — — —
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,166 0 13 1998 12–14 46.2% #49 1,583 0 0
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,286 1 19 1999 21–23 47.7% #47 1,636 0 1
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,327 2 26 2000 25–23 52.1% #46 1,669 0 2
24 2000 57–14 80.3% #2 2,253 3 30 2001 13–19 40.6% #88 1,605 0 2
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,298 3 37 2002 43–25 63.2% #16 1,794 0 6
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,165 3 37 2003 37–21 63.8% #16 1,856 0 8
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,074 3 38 2004 28–24 53.8% #32 1,709 0 9
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,208 3 45 2005 24–16 60.0% #43 1,738 0 11
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,215 3 51 2006 16–16 50.0% #63 1,698 0 12
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,132 3 51 2007 0–3 0.0% #921 1,646 0 12
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,156 3 53 — — — — — — —
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,111 3 55 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lindsay Davenport Anna Smashnova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
15 1991 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1992 2 2 4 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1993 18 8 26 69.2% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1994 7 4 11 63.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 1994 21 6 27 77.8% 12 4 16 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 1995 3 5 8 37.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1995 15 8 23 65.2% 8 1 9 88.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1996 29 6 35 82.9% 9 1 10 90.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1997 36 8 44 81.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 1998 3 6 9 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 1998 43 7 50 86.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 1999 10 8 18 55.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
23 1999 33 8 41 80.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 7 0 7 100.0% 9 1 10 90.0% 2000 7 11 18 38.9% 14 7 21 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 2000 41 9 50 82.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9% 2001 2 7 9 22.2% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
25 2001 51 9 60 85.0% — — — — 9 1 10 90.0% 4 0 4 100.0% 2002 28 14 42 66.7% 15 8 23 65.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2002 21 8 29 72.4% — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 2003 12 9 21 57.1% 20 7 27 74.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
27 2003 30 10 40 75.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0% 2004 12 13 25 48.0% 16 7 23 69.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2004 40 5 45 88.9% 13 3 16 81.3% 5 1 6 83.3% 6 1 7 85.7% 2005 6 6 12 50.0% 18 7 25 72.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2005 38 7 45 84.4% 11 2 13 84.6% 6 1 7 85.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 2006 4 7 11 36.4% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2006 21 8 29 72.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2007 13 1 14 92.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 18 4 22 81.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 471 116 587 80.2% 106 33 139 76.3% 55 16 71 77.5% 79 26 105 75.2% — 98 99 197 49.7% 132 81 213 62.0% 6 21 27 22.2% 6 21 27 22.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 114/278 of Lindsay Davenport's and 26/185 of Anna Smashnova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lindsay Davenport Anna Smashnova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 4/58 0.3 4.5 66.1% 62.1% 46.2% 68.5% 41.2% 56.1% 45.9%
27 2003 13/63 3.1 3.8 57.5% 72.0% 48.9% 70.1% 61.3% 62.1% 50.3% 2004 2/52 0.0 4.0 68.3% 46.3% 26.8% 39.6% 47.3% 40.2% 47.2%
28 2004 20/74 4.7 3.3 61.0% 76.7% 48.0% 71.2% 55.1% 65.5% 51.1% 2005 7/40 0.4 3.7 62.1% 51.7% 43.1% 37.2% 40.9% 48.2% 43.4%
29 2005 28/69 5.6 5.0 59.7% 73.5% 46.4% 56.5% 54.0% 62.4% 48.6% 2006 12/32 0.1 4.9 69.0% 53.7% 41.6% 44.8% 46.0% 50.7% 43.4%
30 2006 19/29 3.9 3.5 57.9% 67.9% 53.5% 56.9% 47.3% 61.8% 47.5% 2007 1/3 0.0 2.0 77.4% 47.9% 50.0% 44.4% 25.0% 48.4% 41.6%
31 2007 9/14 4.9 3.6 57.3% 72.4% 53.0% 46.7% 63.5% 64.0% 52.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 25/29 6.0 4.0 58.0% 74.4% 51.4% 48.4% 54.3% 65.2% 47.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 114/902 4.9 4.0 58.8% 73.1% 49.8% 58.1% 54.7% 63.6% 49.2% — 26/464 0.2 4.3 67.0% 53.7% 41.9% 46.0% 43.2% 50.0% 44.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lindsay Davenport Anna Smashnova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1492 99.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.10
15 1991 1505 103.8 — — — — +36 — — 28.6% -1.71 1–0 — — -0.02 1992 1489 98.0 — — — — +33 — — 37.5% -1.50 1–1 1–0 — +0.20
16 1992 1512 119.7 — — — — +67 0 — 31.3% -1.38 1–1 — — -0.26 1993 1486 98.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.27
17 1993 1859 149.8 — — — — -28 -178 -240 61.3% +0.93 11–3 (79%) 4–4 (50%) 111.2 -0.48 1994 1600 126.0 — — — — +9 -40 — 46.0% -0.46 4–4 (50%) 0–1 — +0.52
18 1994 2041 168.7 — — — — -27 -191 -346 69.7% +1.73 11–7 (61%) 6–5 (55%) 102.2 -2.86 1995 1578 118.0 — — — — +7 +20 — 42.9% -0.38 2–2 (50%) 1–5 (17%) 97.0 +1.76
19 1995 1964 155.1 — — — — -15 -55 -216 64.4% +1.21 10–5 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 100.2 +0.77 1996 1562 121.4 — — — — +39 -21 — 32.4% -1.14 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — -1.26
20 1996 2066 172.6 — — — — +4 -68 -253 73.5% +1.73 6–6 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 100.5 -1.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1997 2166 175.6 — — — — +24 -154 — 74.4% +1.95 10–10 (50%) 7–8 (47%) 94.6 +0.58 1998 1583 118.4 — — — — -14 +56 — 50.0% -0.14 4–8 (33%) 7–0 (100%) 102.4 +0.55
22 1998 2287 180.4 — — — — +50 -220 -395 75.7% +1.94 16–7 (70%) 8–5 (62%) 105.2 -2.47 1999 1636 138.3 — — — — -5 +52 — 48.5% -0.03 7–8 (47%) 3–5 (38%) 99.1 +0.50
23 1999 2328 179.8 — — — — +19 -263 -303 82.2% +2.53 8–4 (67%) 7–2 (78%) 101.9 -1.25 2000 1669 125.9 — — — — -101 +130 -144 50.0% +0.02 6–2 (75%) 4–5 (44%) 103.6 +1.10
24 2000 2254 177.5 — — — — +41 — -106 76.8% +2.17 13–6 (68%) 8–8 (50%) 96.4 -2.76 2001 1605 116.1 — — — — -128 +190 — 41.3% -0.43 6–5 (55%) 4–2 (67%) 102.2 +0.41
25 2001 2298 174.7 — — — — +17 — -24 81.0% +2.19 13–4 (76%) 9–4 (69%) 103.0 -1.06 2002 1794 147.7 — — — — -18 +92 — 60.0% +0.67 12–7 (63%) 8–2 (80%) 109.9 +0.08
26 2002 2166 166.9 — — — — +25 — — 71.1% +1.46 4–6 (40%) 7–5 (58%) 90.6 -0.63 2003 1857 141.4 +0.50 +0.98 1.045 51.1% -69 +127 -365 60.2% +0.59 11–7 (61%) 7–4 (64%) 104.0 -0.34
27 2003 2075 165.9 +4.70 +4.45 1.328 56.1% +52 +20 +133 74.6% +1.95 10–6 (63%) 5–5 (50%) 96.2 -0.74 2004 1710 136.5 -2.30 +0.59 0.788 43.9% -59 +259 — 55.7% +0.50 7–3 (70%) 4–3 (57%) 102.3 +1.59
28 2004 2208 171.1 +7.65 +5.05 1.482 57.9% +54 -118 +45 83.1% +2.56 7–3 (70%) 5–3 (63%) 100.2 -0.46 2005 1739 136.2 -2.91 +0.20 0.837 45.6% -103 +249 — 59.5% +0.79 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.25
29 2005 2215 170.5 +5.92 +4.60 1.294 55.2% +26 -49 +49 79.2% +2.00 16–6 (73%) 9–7 (56%) 103.6 -1.58 2006 1698 126.6 -3.06 -0.34 0.879 46.7% -96 +184 — 52.2% +0.22 5–6 (45%) — — +0.02
30 2006 2133 165.6 +4.92 +4.20 1.241 54.4% +19 — — 71.9% +1.67 4–4 (50%) 7–2 (78%) 97.4 -1.47 2007 1646 92.0 +0.35 -1.43 0.805 44.6% — — — 0.0% -4.33 — — — -0.08
31 2007 2157 145.6 +4.78 +3.86 1.472 58.3% +12 — — 83.9% +2.65 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — -0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 2112 144.2 +7.49 +3.10 1.375 56.0% -6 +44 — 80.0% +2.18 5–0 (100%) 1–1 — -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2375 176.5 +6.17 +4.21 1.351 56.0% +22 -122 -126 74.8% +1.90 149–78 (66%) 95–72 (57%) 101.9 -1.91 — 1882 137.9 -2.28 +0.04 0.879 46.8% -46 +137 -242 51.8% +0.13 70–61 (53%) 40–30 (57%) 105.3 +0.96

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.