H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Anne-Gaelle Sidot H2H: 5-0

Lindsay Davenport holds a 5–0 lead over Anne-Gaelle Sidot in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 4–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2001 Eastbourne fourth round 6-3 6-2.

USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
5 0
5 main draw meetings
FRA Age 46 Left-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 22, 2001* Eastbourne WTA 500 R16 Grass Lindsay Davenport #3 6-3 6-2 Anne-Gaelle Sidot #54 Match data
Mar 11, 2001* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 6-4 6-4 Anne-Gaelle Sidot #34 Match data
Aug 11, 2000* Los Angeles WTA 500 R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 7-6(0) 6-7(4) 6-2 Anne-Gaelle Sidot #25 Match data
Mar 22, 1997* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R64 Hard Lindsay Davenport #7 6-4 6-2 Anne-Gaelle Sidot #38 Match data
Sep 1, 1996* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Lindsay Davenport #8 6-0 6-3 Anne-Gaelle Sidot #90 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Anne-Gaelle Sidot #252 #24 1,128 1,751 90 125 41.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Anne-Gaelle Sidot
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0 1996 6–6 50.0% #50 1,598 0 0
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 1997 22–24 47.8% #33 1,693 0 0
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3 1998 10–21 32.3% #54 1,631 0 0
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4 1999 17–26 39.5% #34 1,719 0 0
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 2000 25–27 48.1% #35 1,701 0 0
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12 2001 9–19 32.1% #120 1,546 0 0
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 2002 1–2 33.3% #246 1,547 0 0
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54