H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Anne Kremer H2H: 4-0

Lindsay Davenport holds a 4–0 lead over Anne Kremer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 4–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2004 Los Angeles third round 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Anne Kremer
LUX Age 50 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 22, 2004* Los Angeles WTA 500 R32 Hard Lindsay Davenport #5 7-5 6-2 Anne Kremer #126 Match data
Jul 26, 2002* Stanford WTA 500 R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #9 6-3 6-0 Anne Kremer #21 Match data
Oct 12, 2001* Filderstadt WTA 500 R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #3 7-5 6-4 Anne Kremer #32 Match data
Mar 22, 2000* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 6-1 6-2 Anne Kremer #35 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Anne Kremer #1,039 #18 1,265 1,810 147 182 44.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Anne Kremer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3 — — — — — — —
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 1996 2–4 33.3% #134 1,509 0 0
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,510 0 0
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,553 0 0
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,641 0 0
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29 2000 27–24 52.9% #33 1,705 0 2
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,670 0 2
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,634 0 2
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44 2004 12–14 46.2% #94 1,620 0 2
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,526 0 2
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,530 0 2
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,519 0 2
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,461 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,475 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2