H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario H2H: 2-6

Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario holds a 6–2 lead over Lindsay Davenport in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario leads 3–2 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2000 Sydney quarterfinal 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4.

USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 6
8 main draw meetings
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 12, 2000* Sydney WTA 500 QF Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #15 Match data
Oct 10, 1998* Filderstadt WTA 250 SF Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 7-6 6-4 Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #4 Match data
Jun 6, 1998* Roland Garros Grand Slam SF Clay Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #5 6-3 7-6(5) Lindsay Davenport #2 Match data
Oct 10, 1997* Filderstadt WTA 250 R16 Hard Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #11 6-4 7-6 Lindsay Davenport #5 Match data
Nov 5, 1994* Oakland WTA 250 SF Carpet Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #2 6-2 4-6 6-3 Lindsay Davenport #7 Match data
Apr 9, 1993* Amelia Island WTA 250 R16 Clay Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #3 6-2 6-4 Lindsay Davenport #47 Match data
Sep 3, 1992* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #5 6-2 6-1 Lindsay Davenport #209 Match data
Mar 15, 1992* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R64 Hard Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #5 6-4 6-4 Lindsay Davenport #281 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #52 #1 3,768 2,385 708 267 72.6% 4 7 0 1 17 29

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1986 15–10 60.0% #81 1,620 0 0
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 1987 12–13 48.0% #54 1,639 0 0
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0 1988 31–15 67.4% #18 1,809 0 1
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 1989 47–13 78.3% #5 2,068 1 3
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3 1990 38–14 73.1% #7 2,081 1 5
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4 1991 56–15 78.9% #5 2,166 1 6
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 1992 59–15 79.7% #4 2,288 1 8
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12 1993 72–14 83.7% #2 2,248 1 12
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 1994 69–9 88.5% #2 2,333 3 20
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25 1995 47–13 78.3% #3 2,156 3 22
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29 1996 52–16 76.5% #3 2,106 3 24
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36 1997 45–22 67.2% #9 2,022 3 24
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36 1998 47–17 73.4% #4 2,039 4 26
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37 1999 25–17 59.5% #17 1,932 4 27
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44 2000 38–18 67.9% #8 1,930 4 27
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50 2001 34–22 60.7% #17 1,795 4 29
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50 2002 21–24 46.7% #53 1,634 4 29
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54