H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Barbara Rittner H2H: 3-0

Lindsay Davenport holds a 3–0 lead over Barbara Rittner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 1994 Wimbledon third round 6-4 3-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Barbara Rittner
GER Age 53 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 26, 1994* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Lindsay Davenport #9 6-4 3-6 6-1 Barbara Rittner #39 Match data
Jan 8, 1994* Brisbane WTA 500 QF Hard Lindsay Davenport #20 6-4 6-0 Barbara Rittner #34 Match data
Jun 25, 1993* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Lindsay Davenport #28 6-0 7-6 Barbara Rittner #27 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Barbara Rittner #438 #24 661 1,883 209 217 49.1% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Barbara Rittner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 1990 3–3 50.0% #110 1,557 0 0
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3 1991 20–17 54.1% #43 1,708 0 0
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4 1992 23–15 60.5% #29 1,829 0 1
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 1993 24–17 58.5% #34 1,838 0 1
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12 1994 25–18 58.1% #40 1,818 0 1
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 1995 17–17 50.0% #51 1,728 0 1
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25 1996 12–16 42.9% #47 1,728 0 1
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29 1997 10–17 37.0% #71 1,653 0 1
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36 1998 13–14 48.1% #66 1,664 0 1
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36 1999 15–18 45.5% #59 1,655 0 1
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37 2000 10–12 45.5% #99 1,661 0 1
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44 2001 16–18 47.1% #68 1,618 0 2
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50 2002 14–19 42.4% #66 1,632 0 2
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50 2003 6–14 30.0% #120 1,568 0 2
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52 2004 1–2 33.3% #235 1,571 0 2
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54 — — — — — — —