H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Barbara Schett H2H: 7-0

Lindsay Davenport holds a 7–0 lead over Barbara Schett in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 4–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2003 Los Angeles third round 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
7 – 0
7 main draw meetings
Barbara Schett
AUT Age 50 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 7, 2003* Los Angeles WTA 500 R32 Hard Lindsay Davenport #4 6-3 6-1 Barbara Schett #54 Match data
Aug 3, 2001* San Diego WTA 500 R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #4 6-1 7-5 Barbara Schett #23 Match data
Jan 11, 2001* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 6-3 6-3 Barbara Schett #22 Match data
Oct 19, 2000* Linz WTA 500 QF Carpet Lindsay Davenport #2 6-2 4-1 (ret.) Barbara Schett #21 Match data
Oct 14, 2000* Zurich WTA 1000 SF Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 6-2 6-1 Barbara Schett #25 Match data
Jun 30, 1999* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Lindsay Davenport #2 7-6 6-1 Barbara Schett #13 Match data
Oct 3, 1996* Leipzig WTA 250 R32 Carpet Lindsay Davenport #5 6-4 7-5 Barbara Schett #39 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Barbara Schett #97 #7 2,188 1,975 256 227 53.0% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Barbara Schett
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0 1992 0–1 0.0% #290 1,487 0 0
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 1993 4–4 50.0% #137 1,547 0 0
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3 1994 9–14 39.1% #100 1,531 0 0
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4 1995 8–10 44.4% #83 1,585 0 0
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 1996 23–18 56.1% #32 1,759 0 1
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12 1997 22–20 52.4% #38 1,762 0 2
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 1998 34–26 56.7% #23 1,822 0 2
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25 1999 46–23 66.7% #8 1,936 0 2
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29 2000 27–22 55.1% #22 1,815 0 3
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36 2001 29–25 53.7% #21 1,757 0 3
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36 2002 24–20 54.5% #40 1,750 0 3
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37 2003 15–24 38.5% #76 1,624 0 3
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44 2004 14–18 43.8% #90 1,590 0 3
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50 2005 1–1 50.0% #97 1,591 0 3
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50 — — — — — — —
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52 — — — — — — —
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54 — — — — — — —