H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy H2H: 3-3

Lindsay Davenport and Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy leads 2–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 1997 Amelia Island fourth round 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
NED Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 11, 1997* Amelia Island WTA 250 R16 Clay Lindsay Davenport #8 6-2 6-1 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #13 Match data
Apr 5, 1997* Hilton Head WTA 1000 QF Clay Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #18 4-6 6-4 6-2 Lindsay Davenport #8 Match data
Nov 9, 1996* Oakland WTA 250 QF Carpet Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #12 6-2 6-4 Lindsay Davenport #6 Match data
Jan 25, 1995* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #7 6-2 3-6 6-2 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #14 Match data
Nov 11, 1994* Philadelphia WTA 1000 R16 Carpet Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #17 2-6 6-2 6-4 Lindsay Davenport #7 Match data
Feb 26, 1993* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #99 6-2 7-5 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #30 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #919 #9 1,672 2,025 295 220 57.3% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0 1987 5–6 45.5% #149 1,515 0 0
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 1988 21–18 53.8% #40 1,689 0 0
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3 1989 15–22 40.5% #83 1,603 0 0
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4 1990 18–17 51.4% #43 1,677 0 0
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 1991 24–19 55.8% #30 1,799 0 1
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12 1992 30–20 60.0% #33 1,818 0 2
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 1993 26–20 56.5% #40 1,789 0 3
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25 1994 44–21 67.7% #15 1,885 0 3
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29 1995 37–15 71.2% #13 1,970 0 5
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36 1996 35–18 66.0% #12 1,908 0 6
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36 1997 34–25 57.6% #15 1,855 0 7
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37 1998 3–10 23.1% #188 1,673 0 7
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44 1999 0–1 0.0% #893 1,651 0 7
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50 — — — — — — —
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50 — — — — — — —
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52 — — — — — — —
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54 — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — 2006 2–3 40.0% #299 1,642 0 7
36 — — — — — — — 2007 1–3 25.0% #190 1,614 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #391 1,592 0 7