H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Camille Pin H2H: 2-0

Lindsay Davenport holds a 2–0 lead over Camille Pin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2008 Miami Open round of 64 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Camille Pin
FRA Age 45 Right-Handed 162 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lindsay Davenport #33 6-2 6-1 Camille Pin #78 Match data Mar 26, 2008* R64 Miami Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Lindsay Davenport #10 6-2 6-1 Camille Pin #135 Match data Jan 15, 2003* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,374 711 191 78.8% 3 1 11 1 26 13 55
Camille Pin #1,143 #61 752 1,619 54 88 38.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Camille Pin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,041 0 3 — — — — — — —
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,964 0 4 2001 1–2 33.3% #175 1,500 0 0
20 1996 47–15 75.8% #9 2,065 0 7 2002 0–2 0.0% #136 1,489 0 0
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,166 0 13 2003 0–2 0.0% #169 1,483 0 0
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,286 1 19 2004 4–7 36.4% #117 1,494 0 0
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,327 2 26 2005 5–13 27.8% #116 1,472 0 0
24 2000 57–14 80.3% #2 2,253 3 30 2006 7–10 41.2% #75 1,523 0 0
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,298 3 37 2007 17–23 42.5% #76 1,604 0 0
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,165 3 37 2008 16–22 42.1% #87 1,591 0 0
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,074 3 38 2009 4–7 36.4% #155 1,579 0 0
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,208 3 45 — — — — — — —
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,215 3 51 — — — — — — —
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,132 3 51 — — — — — — —
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,156 3 53 — — — — — — —
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,111 3 55 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lindsay Davenport Camille Pin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1991 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1992 2 2 4 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1993 18 8 26 69.2% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1994 21 6 27 77.8% 12 4 16 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1995 15 8 23 65.2% 8 1 9 88.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1996 29 6 35 82.9% 9 1 10 90.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 2002 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1997 36 8 44 81.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1998 43 7 50 86.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 2004 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1999 33 8 41 80.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 7 0 7 100.0% 9 1 10 90.0% 2005 5 11 16 31.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2000 41 9 50 82.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9% 2006 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2001 51 9 60 85.0% — — — — 9 1 10 90.0% 4 0 4 100.0% 2007 11 14 25 44.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2002 21 8 29 72.4% — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 2008 11 12 23 47.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2003 30 10 40 75.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0% 2009 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2004 40 5 45 88.9% 13 3 16 81.3% 5 1 6 83.3% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 38 7 45 84.4% 11 2 13 84.6% 6 1 7 85.7% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 21 8 29 72.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 13 1 14 92.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 18 4 22 81.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 471 116 587 80.2% 106 33 139 76.3% 55 16 71 77.5% 79 26 105 75.2% — 42 56 98 42.9% 7 23 30 23.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 114/278 of Lindsay Davenport's and 89/137 of Camille Pin's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lindsay Davenport Camille Pin
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 1/2 0.0 2.0 75.0% 50.0% 20.0% 50.0% 0.0% 42.5% 31.9%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 3/11 0.0 1.7 78.3% 58.9% 37.5% 36.7% 56.3% 54.2% 39.9%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 3/18 0.0 2.3 73.9% 46.5% 35.4% 31.0% 60.6% 44.2% 38.0%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 7/17 0.0 2.1 78.8% 52.0% 35.6% 37.7% 55.7% 48.0% 39.2%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 29/40 0.0 1.6 82.3% 55.6% 42.6% 46.2% 45.9% 53.1% 44.9%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 35/38 0.1 2.2 74.6% 57.2% 45.2% 46.7% 56.0% 54.7% 45.6%
27 2003 13/63 3.1 3.8 57.5% 72.0% 48.9% 70.1% 61.3% 62.1% 50.3% 2009 11/11 0.1 2.5 71.9% 50.7% 40.8% 43.1% 42.2% 47.8% 41.4%
28 2004 20/74 4.7 3.3 61.0% 76.7% 48.0% 71.2% 55.1% 65.5% 51.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 28/69 5.6 5.0 59.7% 73.5% 46.4% 56.5% 54.0% 62.4% 48.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 19/29 3.9 3.5 57.9% 67.9% 53.5% 56.9% 47.3% 61.8% 47.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 9/14 4.9 3.6 57.3% 72.4% 53.0% 46.7% 63.5% 64.0% 52.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 25/29 6.0 4.0 58.0% 74.4% 51.4% 48.4% 54.3% 65.2% 47.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 114/902 4.9 4.0 58.8% 73.1% 49.8% 58.1% 54.7% 63.6% 49.2% — 89/142 0.1 2.0 77.2% 55.1% 42.2% 44.6% 50.5% 52.3% 43.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lindsay Davenport Camille Pin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1991 1505 103.8 — — — — +36 — — 28.6% -1.71 1–0 — — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1992 1512 119.7 — — — — +67 0 — 31.3% -1.38 1–1 — — -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1993 1859 149.8 — — — — -28 -178 -240 61.3% +0.93 11–3 (79%) 4–4 (50%) 111.2 -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1994 2041 168.7 — — — — -27 -191 -346 69.7% +1.73 11–7 (61%) 6–5 (55%) 102.2 -2.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1995 1964 155.1 — — — — -15 -55 -216 64.4% +1.21 10–5 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 100.2 +0.77 2001 1500 102.7 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.43 1–0 — — +0.25
20 1996 2066 172.6 — — — — +4 -68 -253 73.5% +1.73 6–6 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 100.5 -1.62 2002 1489 104.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.17
21 1997 2166 175.6 — — — — +24 -154 — 74.4% +1.95 10–10 (50%) 7–8 (47%) 94.6 +0.58 2003 1484 110.0 +0.77 +0.70 0.555 36.8% — — — 0.0% -4.75 — — — -0.40
22 1998 2287 180.4 — — — — +50 -220 -395 75.7% +1.94 16–7 (70%) 8–5 (62%) 105.2 -2.47 2004 1495 119.2 -0.33 -1.58 0.871 46.4% +39 — — 34.8% -0.35 3–2 (60%) 0–5 (0%) 99.0 -0.02
23 1999 2328 179.8 — — — — +19 -263 -303 82.2% +2.53 8–4 (67%) 7–2 (78%) 101.9 -1.25 2005 1472 120.1 -2.65 -1.66 0.681 41.5% +37 — — 41.9% -0.77 1–8 (11%) 1–0 — -0.44
24 2000 2254 177.5 — — — — +41 — -106 76.8% +2.17 13–6 (68%) 8–8 (50%) 96.4 -2.76 2006 1524 112.1 -2.65 -2.34 0.755 43.8% +48 — — 35.1% -1.22 4–1 (80%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.30
25 2001 2298 174.7 — — — — +17 — -24 81.0% +2.19 13–4 (76%) 9–4 (69%) 103.0 -1.06 2007 1604 128.3 -2.34 +0.54 0.959 48.7% +26 -119 — 45.6% -0.27 5–11 (31%) 4–8 (33%) 94.5 -1.99
26 2002 2166 166.9 — — — — +25 — — 71.1% +1.46 4–6 (40%) 7–5 (58%) 90.6 -0.63 2008 1591 116.4 -0.91 +0.66 1.007 50.1% +15 -156 -49 47.7% -0.10 3–9 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 95.6 -0.36
27 2003 2075 165.9 +4.70 +4.45 1.328 56.1% +52 +20 +133 74.6% +1.95 10–6 (63%) 5–5 (50%) 96.2 -0.74 2009 1580 109.4 -3.42 -1.71 0.794 45.1% +44 -170 — 25.0% -2.15 1–1 0–1 — +0.01
28 2004 2208 171.1 +7.65 +5.05 1.482 57.9% +54 -118 +45 83.1% +2.56 7–3 (70%) 5–3 (63%) 100.2 -0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 2215 170.5 +5.92 +4.60 1.294 55.2% +26 -49 +49 79.2% +2.00 16–6 (73%) 9–7 (56%) 103.6 -1.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 2133 165.6 +4.92 +4.20 1.241 54.4% +19 — — 71.9% +1.67 4–4 (50%) 7–2 (78%) 97.4 -1.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 2157 145.6 +4.78 +3.86 1.472 58.3% +12 — — 83.9% +2.65 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — -0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 2112 144.2 +7.49 +3.10 1.375 56.0% -6 +44 — 80.0% +2.18 5–0 (100%) 1–1 — -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2375 176.5 +6.17 +4.21 1.351 56.0% +22 -122 -126 74.8% +1.90 149–78 (66%) 95–72 (57%) 101.9 -1.91 — 1619 124.3 -1.84 -0.06 0.918 48.0% +31 -139 -49 41.0% -0.64 18–33 (35%) 9–20 (31%) 91.0 -2.41

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.