H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Lindsay Davenport vs Chanda Rubin H2H: 9-3
Lindsay Davenport holds a 9–3 lead over Chanda Rubin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 12 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 6–2 on hard courts and 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2003 San Diego quarterfinal 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
9
–
3
12 main draw meetings
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2003* | San Diego | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-3 6-3 | Chanda Rubin | Match data |
| Aug 10, 2002* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | F | Hard | Chanda Rubin | 5-7 7-6(5) 6-3 | Lindsay Davenport | Match data |
| Aug 2, 2002* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-2 2-6 6-1 | Chanda Rubin | Match data |
| Jun 23, 2001* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | SF | Grass | Lindsay Davenport | 6-1 6-1 | Chanda Rubin | Match data |
| Oct 14, 2000* | Zurich | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-2 6-4 | Chanda Rubin | Match data |
| Jul 29, 2000* | Stanford | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-3 3-6 6-1 | Chanda Rubin | Match data |
| Jul 30, 1999* | Stanford | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-3 6-7 6-3 | Chanda Rubin | Match data |
| Mar 13, 1996* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-0 6-3 | Chanda Rubin | Match data |
| Oct 13, 1995* | Filderstadt | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Chanda Rubin | 4-6 6-2 6-4 | Lindsay Davenport | Match data |
| May 25, 1994* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Lindsay Davenport | 6-7(2) 6-4 6-3 | Chanda Rubin | Match data |
| May 21, 1994* | Lucerne | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Lindsay Davenport | 6-3 3-0 (ret.) | Chanda Rubin | Match data |
| Apr 1, 1993* | Hilton Head | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Chanda Rubin | 6-4 6-1 | Lindsay Davenport | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lindsay Davenport | #35 | #1 | 6,100 | 2,353 | 704 | 190 | 78.7% | 3 | 13 | 1 | 25 | 12 | 54 |
| Chanda Rubin | #1,122 | #6 | 2,554 | 2,047 | 343 | 231 | 59.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lindsay Davenport | Chanda Rubin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #526 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #348 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #84 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1992 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #161 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1993 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #20 | 1,858 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #70 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #6 | 2,022 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #23 | 1,804 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #12 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #15 | 1,945 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #9 | 2,013 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 20–9 | 69.0% | #17 | 1,989 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 57–16 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,161 | 0 | 12 | 1997 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #32 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1998 | 68–14 | 82.9% | #1 | 2,283 | 1 | 18 | 1998 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #35 | 1,800 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1999 | 58–11 | 84.1% | #2 | 2,297 | 2 | 25 | 1999 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #22 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2000 | 56–13 | 81.2% | #2 | 2,228 | 3 | 29 | 2000 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #13 | 1,910 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2001 | 64–10 | 86.5% | #1 | 2,275 | 3 | 36 | 2001 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,806 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2002 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #12 | 2,153 | 3 | 36 | 2002 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #13 | 1,958 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2003 | 48–15 | 76.2% | #5 | 2,076 | 3 | 37 | 2003 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #9 | 1,917 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2004 | 64–10 | 86.5% | #1 | 2,203 | 3 | 44 | 2004 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #52 | 1,860 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2005 | 58–11 | 84.1% | #1 | 2,199 | 3 | 50 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #545 | 1,823 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2006 | 21–8 | 72.4% | #25 | 2,122 | 3 | 50 | 2006 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #486 | 1,719 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 2007 | 13–1 | 92.9% | #72 | 2,147 | 3 | 52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2008 | 23–6 | 79.3% | #35 | 2,063 | 3 | 54 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |