H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Conchita Martínez H2H: 8-8

Lindsay Davenport and Conchita Martínez are tied 8–8 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 16 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 5–4 on hard courts and 2–1 on carpet. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2005 Dubai Tennis Championships quarterfinal 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
8 – 8
16 main-draw meetings
Conchita Martínez
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lindsay Davenport #1 6-1 6-4 Conchita Martínez #35 Match data Mar 5, 2005* QF Dubai Tennis Championships Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Lindsay Davenport #1 6-1 6-0 Conchita Martínez #46 Match data Jan 19, 2005* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Lindsay Davenport #4 6-1 6-2 Conchita Martínez #39 Match data Jul 30, 2004* R16 San Diego Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Conchita Martínez #22 6-4 2-0 (ret.) Lindsay Davenport #6 Match data Jun 3, 2003* R16 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Lindsay Davenport #2 6-0 6-1 Conchita Martínez #5 Match data Nov 9, 2000* SF Philadelphia Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Lindsay Davenport #2 6-2 6-1 Conchita Martínez #7 Match data Mar 19, 2000* QF Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Lindsay Davenport #2 6-7 6-3 6-2 Conchita Martínez #18 Match data Aug 14, 1999* QF Manhattan Beach Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Conchita Martínez #11 4-6 6-3 6-3 Lindsay Davenport #3 Match data Feb 1, 1998* SF Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Lindsay Davenport #3 6-3 6-0 Conchita Martínez #10 Match data Nov 14, 1997* R16 Philadelphia Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Conchita Martínez #9 6-4 4-6 6-2 Lindsay Davenport #5 Match data Aug 16, 1997* QF Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Conchita Martínez #2 6-1 6-3 Lindsay Davenport #12 Match data Jun 6, 1996* QF Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Conchita Martínez #2 6-2 6-3 Lindsay Davenport #14 Match data Feb 3, 1996* QF Pan Pacific Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Conchita Martínez #2 6-3 6-1 Lindsay Davenport #12 Match data Jan 24, 1996* R16 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Conchita Martínez #3 6-3 4-6 6-3 Lindsay Davenport #7 Match data Jan 27, 1995* QF Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Conchita Martínez #3 6-2 6-7 6-3 Lindsay Davenport #9 Match data Jul 1, 1994* QF Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Lindsay Davenport #13 4-6 6-4 7-6 Conchita Martínez #3 Match data Apr 9, 1994* QF Amelia Island Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,374 711 191 78.8% 3 1 11 1 26 13 55
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 676 279 70.8% 1 0 9 0 7 16 33

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Conchita Martínez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,512 0 0 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,729 0 1
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,927 0 4
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,041 0 3 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,061 0 7
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,964 0 4 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10
20 1996 47–15 75.8% #9 2,065 0 7 1992 47–17 73.4% #8 2,057 0 11
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,166 0 13 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,159 0 16
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,286 1 19 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,064 1 20
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,327 2 26 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26
24 2000 57–14 80.3% #2 2,253 3 30 1996 47–17 73.4% #5 2,066 1 28
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,298 3 37 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,010 1 28
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,165 3 37 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,967 1 30
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,074 3 38 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,208 3 45 2000 49–20 71.0% #5 1,922 1 32
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,215 3 51 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,843 1 32
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,132 3 51 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,755 1 32
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,156 3 53 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,755 1 32
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,111 3 55 2004 20–17 54.1% #42 1,752 1 32
33 — — — — — — — 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,799 1 33

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lindsay Davenport Conchita Martínez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1991 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1992 2 2 4 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 5 1 6 83.3% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
17 1993 18 8 26 69.2% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1989 20 4 24 83.3% 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
18 1994 21 6 27 77.8% 12 4 16 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 1990 17 3 20 85.0% 18 5 23 78.3% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
19 1995 15 8 23 65.2% 8 1 9 88.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1991 8 6 14 57.1% 24 3 27 88.9% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1%
20 1996 29 6 35 82.9% 9 1 10 90.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1992 13 5 18 72.2% 21 5 26 80.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7%
21 1997 36 8 44 81.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 1993 28 6 34 82.4% 20 3 23 87.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 13 3 16 81.3%
22 1998 43 7 50 86.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 1994 20 7 27 74.1% 21 4 25 84.0% 7 0 7 100.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 1999 33 8 41 80.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 7 0 7 100.0% 9 1 10 90.0% 1995 25 5 30 83.3% 24 1 25 96.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 3 6 50.0%
24 2000 41 9 50 82.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9% 1996 19 7 26 73.1% 17 5 22 77.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0%
25 2001 51 9 60 85.0% — — — — 9 1 10 90.0% 4 0 4 100.0% 1997 17 8 25 68.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0%
26 2002 21 8 29 72.4% — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 1998 18 9 27 66.7% 17 4 21 81.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 2003 30 10 40 75.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0% 1999 14 11 25 56.0% 20 6 26 76.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3%
28 2004 40 5 45 88.9% 13 3 16 81.3% 5 1 6 83.3% 6 1 7 85.7% 2000 25 12 37 67.6% 20 5 25 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
29 2005 38 7 45 84.4% 11 2 13 84.6% 6 1 7 85.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 2001 4 4 8 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2006 21 8 29 72.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 16 14 30 53.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
31 2007 13 1 14 92.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 13 13 26 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
32 2008 18 4 22 81.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2004 9 10 19 47.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 20 12 32 62.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
Career — 471 116 587 80.2% 106 33 139 76.3% 55 16 71 77.5% 79 26 105 75.2% — 291 137 428 68.0% 279 85 364 76.6% 48 19 67 71.6% 58 38 96 60.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 114/278 of Lindsay Davenport's and 18/135 of Conchita Martínez's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lindsay Davenport Conchita Martínez
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
27 2003 13/63 3.1 3.8 57.5% 72.0% 48.9% 70.1% 61.3% 62.1% 50.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 20/74 4.7 3.3 61.0% 76.7% 48.0% 71.2% 55.1% 65.5% 51.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 28/69 5.6 5.0 59.7% 73.5% 46.4% 56.5% 54.0% 62.4% 48.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 19/29 3.9 3.5 57.9% 67.9% 53.5% 56.9% 47.3% 61.8% 47.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 9/14 4.9 3.6 57.3% 72.4% 53.0% 46.7% 63.5% 64.0% 52.9% 2003 10/50 1.5 3.6 58.2% 62.7% 46.9% 50.8% 52.5% 55.9% 49.1%
32 2008 25/29 6.0 4.0 58.0% 74.4% 51.4% 48.4% 54.3% 65.2% 47.8% 2004 4/37 3.0 3.8 57.1% 64.2% 49.7% 52.7% 37.0% 58.0% 42.7%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 4/48 2.3 3.3 60.9% 58.0% 45.4% 59.9% 60.8% 52.9% 44.2%
Career — 114/902 4.9 4.0 58.8% 73.1% 49.8% 58.1% 54.7% 63.6% 49.2% — 18/955 2.0 3.6 58.6% 62.0% 47.2% 53.2% 50.9% 55.7% 46.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lindsay Davenport Conchita Martínez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1991 1505 103.8 — — — — +36 — — 28.6% -1.71 1–0 — — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1992 1512 119.7 — — — — +67 0 — 31.3% -1.38 1–1 — — -0.26 1988 1730 145.2 — — — — -22 -81 — 65.2% +1.39 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 106.6 +0.57
17 1993 1859 149.8 — — — — -28 -178 -240 61.3% +0.93 11–3 (79%) 4–4 (50%) 111.2 -0.48 1989 1928 154.3 — — — — -62 -75 — 77.2% +2.01 3–3 (50%) 3–0 (100%) 102.5 +1.51
18 1994 2041 168.7 — — — — -27 -191 -346 69.7% +1.73 11–7 (61%) 6–5 (55%) 102.2 -2.86 1990 2062 158.8 — — — — -43 -68 — 75.7% +1.82 5–2 (71%) 6–3 (67%) 105.9 -1.28
19 1995 1964 155.1 — — — — -15 -55 -216 64.4% +1.21 10–5 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 100.2 +0.77 1991 2076 163.5 — — — — -95 +132 — 72.1% +1.48 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 99.7 -3.74
20 1996 2066 172.6 — — — — +4 -68 -253 73.5% +1.73 6–6 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 100.5 -1.62 1992 2058 170.3 — — — — -34 +215 -444 70.6% +1.60 8–7 (53%) 5–0 (100%) 103.4 -3.06
21 1997 2166 175.6 — — — — +24 -154 — 74.4% +1.95 10–10 (50%) 7–8 (47%) 94.6 +0.58 1993 2160 168.9 — — — — -45 +158 -369 79.8% +2.22 10–4 (71%) 5–2 (71%) 102.8 +1.51
22 1998 2287 180.4 — — — — +50 -220 -395 75.7% +1.94 16–7 (70%) 8–5 (62%) 105.2 -2.47 1994 2065 167.5 — — — — -60 +202 -125 72.3% +1.80 13–5 (72%) 5–6 (45%) 103.9 -0.84
23 1999 2328 179.8 — — — — +19 -263 -303 82.2% +2.53 8–4 (67%) 7–2 (78%) 101.9 -1.25 1995 2182 174.1 — — — — -103 +200 -185 77.9% +2.36 13–4 (76%) 8–3 (73%) 106.8 -1.30
24 2000 2254 177.5 — — — — +41 — -106 76.8% +2.17 13–6 (68%) 8–8 (50%) 96.4 -2.76 1996 2067 172.1 — — — — -13 +243 +14 70.6% +1.81 8–7 (53%) 3–8 (27%) 93.2 -0.86
25 2001 2298 174.7 — — — — +17 — -24 81.0% +2.19 13–4 (76%) 9–4 (69%) 103.0 -1.06 1997 2010 168.8 — — — — +12 +183 +59 61.9% +1.14 10–4 (71%) 4–3 (57%) 100.5 -0.78
26 2002 2166 166.9 — — — — +25 — — 71.1% +1.46 4–6 (40%) 7–5 (58%) 90.6 -0.63 1998 1968 163.0 — — — — -9 +240 +102 66.7% +1.41 9–6 (60%) 5–6 (45%) 97.0 +0.15
27 2003 2075 165.9 +4.70 +4.45 1.328 56.1% +52 +20 +133 74.6% +1.95 10–6 (63%) 5–5 (50%) 96.2 -0.74 1999 1898 159.2 — — — — -48 +259 +117 60.1% +0.91 11–7 (61%) 4–4 (50%) 101.6 -1.25
28 2004 2208 171.1 +7.65 +5.05 1.482 57.9% +54 -118 +45 83.1% +2.56 7–3 (70%) 5–3 (63%) 100.2 -0.46 2000 1923 160.0 — — — — -33 +232 — 65.1% +0.97 13–5 (72%) 7–1 (88%) 106.8 +0.60
29 2005 2215 170.5 +5.92 +4.60 1.294 55.2% +26 -49 +49 79.2% +2.00 16–6 (73%) 9–7 (56%) 103.6 -1.58 2001 1844 131.6 — — — — -41 +234 +229 58.9% +0.57 4–5 (44%) 4–1 (80%) 94.7 +2.93
30 2006 2133 165.6 +4.92 +4.20 1.241 54.4% +19 — — 71.9% +1.67 4–4 (50%) 7–2 (78%) 97.4 -1.47 2002 1756 136.7 — — — — +1 +131 +317 52.6% +0.14 7–13 (35%) 7–6 (54%) 91.8 +0.17
31 2007 2157 145.6 +4.78 +3.86 1.472 58.3% +12 — — 83.9% +2.65 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — -0.41 2003 1756 135.1 +0.69 +3.18 1.111 52.4% -58 +154 +313 57.1% +0.35 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 99.0 -0.01
32 2008 2112 144.2 +7.49 +3.10 1.375 56.0% -6 +44 — 80.0% +2.18 5–0 (100%) 1–1 — -0.18 2004 1752 150.1 +1.60 +0.47 1.017 49.5% -42 +159 +267 54.9% +0.76 3–7 (30%) 0–3 (0%) 91.9 -0.78
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1799 146.1 -0.23 +0.73 0.939 49.0% +2 +89 +156 57.0% +0.49 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 101.4 -1.48
50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1772 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1745 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2375 176.5 +6.17 +4.21 1.351 56.0% +22 -122 -126 74.8% +1.90 149–78 (66%) 95–72 (57%) 101.9 -1.91 — 2263 167.3 +0.69 +2.03 1.051 51.0% -38 +158 +18 67.3% +1.36 138–95 (59%) 79–53 (60%) 103.6 -0.83

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.