H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 14:15 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Conchita Martínez H2H: 8-8

Lindsay Davenport and Conchita Martínez are tied 8–8 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 16 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 5–4 on hard courts and 2–1 on carpet. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2005 Dubai quarterfinal 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
8 – 8
16 main draw meetings
Conchita Martínez
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 5, 2005* Dubai WTA 500 QF Hard Lindsay Davenport #1 6-1 6-4 Conchita Martínez #35 Match data
Jan 19, 2005* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Lindsay Davenport #1 6-1 6-0 Conchita Martínez #46 Match data
Jul 30, 2004* San Diego WTA 1000 R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #4 6-1 6-2 Conchita Martínez #39 Match data
Jun 3, 2003* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Conchita Martínez #22 6-4 2-0 (ret.) Lindsay Davenport #6 Match data
Nov 9, 2000* Philadelphia WTA 500 SF Carpet Lindsay Davenport #2 6-0 6-1 Conchita Martínez #5 Match data
Mar 15, 2000* Indian Wells WTA 1000 QF Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 6-2 6-1 Conchita Martínez #7 Match data
Aug 14, 1999* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 QF Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 6-7 6-3 6-2 Conchita Martínez #18 Match data
Feb 1, 1998* Australian Open Grand Slam SF Hard Conchita Martínez #11 4-6 6-3 6-3 Lindsay Davenport #3 Match data
Nov 14, 1997* Philadelphia WTA 250 R16 Carpet Lindsay Davenport #3 6-3 6-0 Conchita Martínez #10 Match data
Aug 16, 1997* Canadian Open WTA 1000 QF Hard Conchita Martínez #9 6-4 4-6 6-2 Lindsay Davenport #5 Match data
Jun 6, 1996* Roland Garros Grand Slam QF Clay Conchita Martínez #2 6-1 6-3 Lindsay Davenport #12 Match data
Feb 3, 1996* Tokyo WTA 1000 QF Carpet Conchita Martínez #2 6-2 6-3 Lindsay Davenport #14 Match data
Jan 24, 1996* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Conchita Martínez #2 6-3 6-1 Lindsay Davenport #12 Match data
Jan 27, 1995* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Conchita Martínez #3 6-3 4-6 6-3 Lindsay Davenport #7 Match data
Jul 1, 1994* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Conchita Martínez #3 6-2 6-7 6-3 Lindsay Davenport #9 Match data
Apr 9, 1994* Amelia Island WTA 250 QF Clay Lindsay Davenport #13 4-6 6-4 7-6 Conchita Martínez #3 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 669 275 70.9% 1 9 0 4 19 33

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Conchita Martínez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,730 0 1
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,933 0 4
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,063 0 7
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 1992 44–16 73.3% #8 2,054 0 11
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,158 0 16
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29 1996 44–16 73.3% #4 2,074 1 28
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,011 1 28
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,968 1 30
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44 2000 48–19 71.6% #5 1,951 1 32
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,852 1 32
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,756 1 32
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,756 1 32
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54 2004 20–16 55.6% #42 1,772 1 32
33 — — — — — — — 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,812 1 33