H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Daja Bedanova H2H: 5-0

Lindsay Davenport holds a 5–0 lead over Daja Bedanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 4–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2003 Charleston third round 6-0 6-1.

USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
5 0
5 main draw meetings
CZE Age 43 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 10, 2003* Charleston WTA 1000 R32 Clay Lindsay Davenport #5 6-0 6-1 Daja Bedanova #47 Match data
Mar 7, 2003* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Lindsay Davenport #7 6-3 5-7 6-1 Daja Bedanova #48 Match data
Oct 26, 2001* Linz WTA 500 R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #3 7-6(6) 6-0 Daja Bedanova #29 Match data
Aug 10, 2001* Los Angeles WTA 500 R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #3 6-3 6-3 Daja Bedanova #42 Match data
Mar 23, 2001* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 6-1 4-1 (ret.) Daja Bedanova #43 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Daja Bedanova #998 #16 1,323 1,801 64 71 47.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Daja Bedanova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0 1999 1–1 50.0% #295 1,522 0 0
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 2000 12–8 60.0% #53 1,688 0 1
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3 2001 20–20 50.0% #28 1,768 0 1
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4 2002 24–25 49.0% #37 1,712 0 1
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 2003 6–15 28.6% #155 1,594 0 1
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 2005 1–2 33.3% #295 1,596 0 1
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54