H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Elena Likhovtseva H2H: 9-0

Lindsay Davenport holds a 9–0 lead over Elena Likhovtseva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 7–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2006 Dubai fourth round 6-0 6-0.

USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
9 0
9 main draw meetings
RUS Age 50 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 24, 2006* Dubai WTA 500 R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #3 6-0 6-0 Elena Likhovtseva #16 Match data
Mar 8, 2003* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Lindsay Davenport #7 6-3 6-0 Elena Likhovtseva #29 Match data
Sep 4, 2001* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #3 6-3 0-6 6-3 Elena Likhovtseva #27 Match data
Jun 29, 2000* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Lindsay Davenport #2 3-6 6-3 6-3 Elena Likhovtseva #23 Match data
Mar 24, 2000* Miami WTA 1000 R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 6-4 6-4 Elena Likhovtseva #17 Match data
Jan 11, 2000* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 6-1 6-2 Elena Likhovtseva #18 Match data
Mar 22, 1999* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 6-2 6-0 Elena Likhovtseva #23 Match data
May 31, 1998* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Lindsay Davenport #2 7-5 7-5 Elena Likhovtseva #31 Match data
Jul 26, 1997* Stanford WTA 250 QF Hard Lindsay Davenport #7 7-6 6-3 Elena Likhovtseva #26 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Elena Likhovtseva #1,092 #15 1,807 1,912 358 338 51.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Elena Likhovtseva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 1993 11–8 57.9% #67 1,633 0 1
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3 1994 17–19 47.2% #62 1,736 0 1
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4 1995 18–18 50.0% #45 1,718 0 1
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 1996 30–21 58.8% #18 1,819 0 1
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12 1997 24–24 50.0% #31 1,749 0 2
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 1998 35–29 54.7% #26 1,829 0 2
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25 1999 34–29 54.0% #18 1,755 0 2
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29 2000 29–27 51.8% #21 1,770 0 2
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36 2001 25–24 51.0% #36 1,746 0 2
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36 2002 24–27 47.1% #42 1,666 0 2
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37 2003 26–26 50.0% #37 1,678 0 2
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44 2004 26–24 52.0% #24 1,828 0 3
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50 2005 30–22 57.7% #17 1,795 0 3
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50 2006 16–20 44.4% #43 1,695 0 3
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52 2007 13–17 43.3% #62 1,665 0 3
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54 2008 0–3 0.0% #1044 1,634 0 3