H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lindsay Davenport vs Fang Li H2H: 1-0
Lindsay Davenport holds a 1–0 lead over Fang Li in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lindsay Davenport leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 1998 Key Biscayne third round 3-6 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 1998* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Lindsay Davenport | 3-6 6-1 6-3 | Fang Li | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lindsay Davenport | #35 | #1 | 6,100 | 2,353 | 704 | 190 | 78.7% | 3 | 13 | 1 | 25 | 12 | 54 |
| Fang Li | #488 | #36 | 723 | 1,705 | 67 | 89 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lindsay Davenport | Fang Li | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #348 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #119 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #161 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #20 | 1,858 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #6 | 2,022 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #12 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #9 | 2,013 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 57–16 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,161 | 0 | 12 | 1998 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #40 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 68–14 | 82.9% | #1 | 2,283 | 1 | 18 | 1999 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 58–11 | 84.1% | #2 | 2,297 | 2 | 25 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #503 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 56–13 | 81.2% | #2 | 2,228 | 3 | 29 | 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #488 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 64–10 | 86.5% | #1 | 2,275 | 3 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #12 | 2,153 | 3 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 48–15 | 76.2% | #5 | 2,076 | 3 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 64–10 | 86.5% | #1 | 2,203 | 3 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 58–11 | 84.1% | #1 | 2,199 | 3 | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 21–8 | 72.4% | #25 | 2,122 | 3 | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 13–1 | 92.9% | #72 | 2,147 | 3 | 52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 23–6 | 79.3% | #35 | 2,063 | 3 | 54 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |