H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Florencia Labat H2H: 4-0

Lindsay Davenport holds a 4–0 lead over Florencia Labat in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 2–0 on grass and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 1999 Australian Open second round 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Florencia Labat
ARG Age 55 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 22, 1999* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Lindsay Davenport #1 6-2 6-1 Florencia Labat #59 Match data
Jun 24, 1998* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Lindsay Davenport #2 6-2 6-2 Florencia Labat #50 Match data
Jun 30, 1995* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Lindsay Davenport #7 6-1 6-1 Florencia Labat #53 Match data
Jan 9, 1994* Brisbane WTA 500 F Hard Lindsay Davenport #20 6-1 2-6 6-3 Florencia Labat #51 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Florencia Labat #106 #26 733 1,875 190 181 51.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Florencia Labat
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,482 0 0
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3 1989 8–8 50.0% #77 1,546 0 0
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4 1990 12–18 40.0% #100 1,572 0 0
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 1991 19–17 52.8% #60 1,671 0 0
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12 1992 18–16 52.9% #52 1,736 0 0
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 1993 21–16 56.8% #51 1,764 0 0
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25 1994 27–15 64.3% #38 1,793 0 0
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29 1995 16–13 55.2% #55 1,783 0 0
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36 1996 24–17 58.5% #42 1,767 0 0
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36 1997 21–25 45.7% #39 1,674 0 0
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37 1998 13–20 39.4% #64 1,655 0 0
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44 1999 3–6 33.3% #117 1,620 0 0
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50 2000 8–9 47.1% #106 1,624 0 0
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50 — — — — — — —
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52 — — — — — — —
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54 — — — — — — —