H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Gigi Fernandez H2H: 2-0

Lindsay Davenport holds a 2–0 lead over Gigi Fernandez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 1996 Eastbourne third round 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Gigi Fernandez
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 21, 1996* Eastbourne WTA 250 R32 Grass Lindsay Davenport #8 6-3 6-1 Gigi Fernandez #68 Match data
Jun 28, 1995* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Lindsay Davenport #7 6-2 4-6 7-5 Gigi Fernandez #19 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Gigi Fernandez #181 #17 247 1,912 227 217 51.1% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Gigi Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4 1983 4–8 33.3% — 1,524 0 0
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 1984 18–16 52.9% #27 1,723 0 0
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12 1985 9–18 33.3% #64 1,655 0 0
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 1986 17–14 54.8% #57 1,729 0 1
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25 1987 16–17 48.5% #39 1,681 0 1
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29 1988 15–18 45.5% #53 1,684 0 1
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36 1989 23–15 60.5% #23 1,810 0 1
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36 1990 18–14 56.2% #36 1,765 0 1
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37 1991 30–18 62.5% #22 1,809 0 2
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44 1992 22–16 57.9% #32 1,806 0 2
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50 1993 17–17 50.0% #50 1,730 0 2
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50 1994 17–17 50.0% #32 1,789 0 2
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52 1995 11–13 45.8% #65 1,738 0 2
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54 1996 7–12 36.8% #112 1,687 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 1997 3–3 50.0% #180 1,707 0 2