H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Helena Sukova H2H: 2-0

Lindsay Davenport holds a 2–0 lead over Helena Sukova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 1995 Oakland quarterfinal 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Helena Sukova
CZE Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 4, 1995* Oakland WTA 250 QF Carpet Lindsay Davenport #10 6-4 6-3 Helena Sukova #26 Match data
May 22, 1993* Lucerne WTA 250 QF Clay Lindsay Davenport #43 7-5 6-2 Helena Sukova #14 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Helena Sukova #102 #4 735 2,217 580 297 66.1% 0 1 0 3 5 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Helena Sukova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0 1981 6–4 60.0% — 1,583 0 0
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 1982 23–23 50.0% — 1,757 0 0
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3 1983 33–20 62.3% — 1,907 0 0
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4 1984 48–23 67.6% #7 2,041 0 1
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 1985 54–21 72.0% #9 2,028 0 1
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12 1986 69–21 76.7% #6 2,151 0 3
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 1987 58–19 75.3% #7 2,129 0 5
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25 1988 49–19 72.1% #8 2,120 0 5
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29 1989 39–15 72.2% #8 2,043 0 6
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36 1990 41–17 70.7% #14 2,025 0 6
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36 1991 34–18 65.4% #17 1,958 0 7
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37 1992 38–15 71.7% #12 1,976 0 9
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44 1993 24–15 61.5% #17 1,925 0 9
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50 1994 21–14 60.0% #22 1,889 0 9
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50 1995 18–15 54.5% #29 1,819 0 9
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52 1996 17–15 53.1% #35 1,792 0 9
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54 1997 8–21 27.6% #80 1,661 0 9
33 — — — — — — — 1998 0–2 0.0% #102 1,637 0 9