H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 08:10 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Iva Majoli H2H: 5-4

Lindsay Davenport holds a 5–4 lead over Iva Majoli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on clay, while Lindsay Davenport leads 2–1 on carpet. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2003 Tokyo fourth round 6-4 6-4.

USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
5 4
9 main draw meetings
CRO Age 48 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 31, 2003* Tokyo WTA 1000 R16 Carpet Lindsay Davenport #10 6-4 6-4 Iva Majoli #34 Match data
Feb 3, 2001* Tokyo WTA 1000 QF Carpet Lindsay Davenport #2 6-2 6-0 Iva Majoli #56 Match data
Jun 4, 1998* Roland Garros Grand Slam QF Clay Lindsay Davenport #2 6-1 5-7 6-3 Iva Majoli #10 Match data
Jun 3, 1997* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Iva Majoli #9 5-7 6-4 6-2 Lindsay Davenport #5 Match data
Oct 5, 1996* Leipzig WTA 250 QF Carpet Iva Majoli #4 6-7 7-6 7-6 Lindsay Davenport #5 Match data
Apr 2, 1994* Hilton Head WTA 1000 QF Clay Iva Majoli #40 7-5 1-6 6-2 Lindsay Davenport #11 Match data
Mar 24, 1994* Houston WTA 250 R32 Clay Lindsay Davenport #11 6-2 6-1 Iva Majoli #39 Match data
Mar 31, 1993* Hilton Head WTA 1000 R64 Clay Lindsay Davenport #46 6-1 6-4 Iva Majoli #37 Match data
Apr 16, 1992* Houston WTA 250 R32 Clay Iva Majoli #537 6-3 6-4 Lindsay Davenport #228 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Iva Majoli #777 #4 3,406 2,157 259 190 57.7% 1 3 0 0 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Iva Majoli
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1992 7–6 53.8% #50 1,624 0 0
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 1993 13–13 50.0% #46 1,736 0 0
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0 1994 38–19 66.7% #13 1,922 0 0
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 1995 29–12 70.7% #9 2,046 0 2
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3 1996 39–16 70.9% #8 2,040 0 4
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4 1997 43–21 67.2% #6 1,947 1 7
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 1998 23–20 53.5% #25 1,828 1 7
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12 1999 5–11 31.2% #164 1,694 1 7
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 2000 11–10 52.4% #62 1,703 1 7
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25 2001 20–22 47.6% #44 1,697 1 7
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29 2002 23–22 51.1% #32 1,668 1 8
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36 2003 7–15 31.8% #131 1,589 1 8
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36 2004 1–3 25.0% #321 1,564 1 8
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54