Home
/
H2H
/
Lindsay Davenport vs Iva Majoli
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Lindsay Davenport vs Iva Majoli H2H: 6-4
Lindsay Davenport holds a 6–4 lead over Iva Majoli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on clay, while Lindsay Davenport leads 2–1 on carpet. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2003 Pan Pacific Open round of 16 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups?
Advanced rivalry search
lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
6
–
4
10 main-draw meetings
CRO
Age 49
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
Player Score Player Match Data Date Round Tournament Category Surface
Lindsay Davenport
#10
6-4 6-4
Iva Majoli
#34
Match data
Jan 31, 2003*
R16
Pan Pacific Open
Tier I
→
modern equivalent
WTA 1000
Carpet
Lindsay Davenport
#2
6-2 6-0
Iva Majoli
#56
Match data
Feb 3, 2001*
QF
Pan Pacific Open
Tier I
→
modern equivalent
WTA 1000
Carpet
Lindsay Davenport
#2
6-1 5-7 6-3
Iva Majoli
#10
Match data
Jun 4, 1998*
QF
Roland Garros
Grand Slam
Clay
Iva Majoli
#9
5-7 6-4 6-2
Lindsay Davenport
#5
Match data
Jun 3, 1997*
R16
Roland Garros
Grand Slam
Clay
Iva Majoli
#4
6-7 7-6 7-6
Lindsay Davenport
#5
Match data
Oct 5, 1996*
QF
Leipzig
Tier II
→
modern equivalent
WTA 500
Carpet
Lindsay Davenport
#10
7-5 6-3
Iva Majoli
#4
Match data
Aug 1, 1996*
QF
Atlanta Olympics
Olympics
Hard
Iva Majoli
#40
7-5 1-6 6-2
Lindsay Davenport
#11
Match data
Apr 2, 1994*
QF
Hilton Head
Tier I
→
modern equivalent
WTA 1000
Clay
Lindsay Davenport
#11
6-2 6-1
Iva Majoli
#39
Match data
Mar 24, 1994*
R32
Houston
Tier II
→
modern equivalent
WTA 500
Clay
Lindsay Davenport
#46
6-1 6-4
Iva Majoli
#37
Match data
Mar 31, 1993*
R64
Hilton Head
Tier I
→
modern equivalent
WTA 1000
Clay
Iva Majoli
#537
6-3 6-4
Lindsay Davenport
#228
Match data
Apr 16, 1992*
R32
Houston
Tier II
→
modern equivalent
WTA 500
Clay
*
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category.
Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories.
Mapping details.
Career Comparison
Player
Current
Peak
Pts
Elo
W
L
Win %
GS
Olympics
1000* including documented historical predecessor categories
Finals
500* including documented historical predecessor categories
250* including documented historical predecessor categories
Titles
Lindsay Davenport
#35
#1
6,100
2,374
711
191
78.8%
3
1
11
1
26
13
55
Iva Majoli
#777
#4
3,406
2,155
262
192
57.7%
1
0
3
0
4
0
8
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
Yr W-L Win % Rank Elo GS Titles
Yr W-L Win % Rank Elo GS Titles
14
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1992
7–6
53.8%
#50
1,624
0
0
15
1991
1–2
33.3%
#348
1,504
0
0
1993
13–13
50.0%
#46
1,735
0
0
16
1992
2–5
28.6%
#161
1,512
0
0
1994
38–19
66.7%
#13
1,921
0
0
17
1993
31–15
67.4%
#20
1,858
0
1
1995
29–12
70.7%
#9
2,045
0
2
18
1994
44–15
74.6%
#6
2,041
0
3
1996
42–17
71.2%
#7
2,038
0
4
19
1995
31–14
68.9%
#12
1,964
0
4
1997
43–21
67.2%
#6
1,946
1
7
20
1996
47–15
75.8%
#9
2,065
0
7
1998
23–20
53.5%
#25
1,828
1
7
21
1997
57–16
78.1%
#3
2,166
0
13
1999
5–11
31.2%
#164
1,694
1
7
22
1998
68–14
82.9%
#1
2,286
1
19
2000
11–11
50.0%
#62
1,695
1
7
23
1999
58–11
84.1%
#2
2,327
2
26
2001
20–22
47.6%
#44
1,697
1
7
24
2000
57–14
80.3%
#2
2,253
3
30
2002
23–22
51.1%
#32
1,667
1
8
25
2001
64–10
86.5%
#1
2,298
3
37
2003
7–15
31.8%
#131
1,606
1
8
26
2002
24–9
72.7%
#12
2,165
3
37
2004
1–3
25.0%
#321
1,579
1
8
27
2003
48–15
76.2%
#5
2,074
3
38
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
28
2004
64–10
86.5%
#1
2,208
3
45
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
29
2005
58–11
84.1%
#1
2,215
3
51
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
30
2006
21–8
72.4%
#25
2,132
3
51
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
31
2007
13–1
92.9%
#72
2,156
3
53
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
32
2008
23–6
79.3%
#35
2,111
3
55
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year.
Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
Yr
Yr
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
14
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1992
3
4
7
42.9%
2
1
3
66.7%
—
—
—
—
2
1
3
66.7%
15
1991
1
2
3
33.3%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1993
4
6
10
40.0%
4
3
7
57.1%
—
—
—
—
5
4
9
55.6%
16
1992
2
2
4
50.0%
0
3
3
0.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1994
16
7
23
69.6%
13
5
18
72.2%
2
2
4
50.0%
7
5
12
58.3%
17
1993
18
8
26
69.2%
8
3
11
72.7%
2
2
4
50.0%
3
2
5
60.0%
1995
14
3
17
82.4%
11
5
16
68.8%
0
1
1
0.0%
4
3
7
57.1%
18
1994
21
6
27
77.8%
12
4
16
75.0%
4
1
5
80.0%
7
4
11
63.6%
1996
10
6
16
62.5%
15
6
21
71.4%
2
1
3
66.7%
15
4
19
78.9%
19
1995
15
8
23
65.2%
8
1
9
88.9%
3
1
4
75.0%
5
4
9
55.6%
1997
8
9
17
47.1%
19
4
23
82.6%
4
2
6
66.7%
12
6
18
66.7%
20
1996
29
6
35
82.9%
9
1
10
90.0%
2
2
4
50.0%
7
6
13
53.8%
1998
6
5
11
54.5%
9
6
15
60.0%
1
1
2
50.0%
7
8
15
46.7%
21
1997
36
8
44
81.8%
10
4
14
71.4%
1
1
2
50.0%
10
3
13
76.9%
1999
0
5
5
0.0%
4
3
7
57.1%
—
—
—
—
1
3
4
25.0%
22
1998
43
7
50
86.0%
11
4
15
73.3%
4
1
5
80.0%
10
2
12
83.3%
2000
5
5
10
50.0%
5
4
9
55.6%
—
—
—
—
1
2
3
33.3%
23
1999
33
8
41
80.5%
9
2
11
81.8%
7
0
7
100.0%
9
1
10
90.0%
2001
11
11
22
50.0%
3
6
9
33.3%
0
1
1
0.0%
6
4
10
60.0%
24
2000
41
9
50
82.0%
1
2
3
33.3%
7
2
9
77.8%
8
1
9
88.9%
2002
7
12
19
36.8%
14
7
21
66.7%
2
1
3
66.7%
0
2
2
0.0%
25
2001
51
9
60
85.0%
—
—
—
—
9
1
10
90.0%
4
0
4
100.0%
2003
0
6
6
0.0%
6
7
13
46.2%
0
1
1
0.0%
1
1
2
50.0%
26
2002
21
8
29
72.4%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
3
1
4
75.0%
2004
1
2
3
33.3%
0
1
1
0.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
27
2003
30
10
40
75.0%
10
3
13
76.9%
4
2
6
66.7%
4
0
4
100.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
28
2004
40
5
45
88.9%
13
3
16
81.3%
5
1
6
83.3%
6
1
7
85.7%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
29
2005
38
7
45
84.4%
11
2
13
84.6%
6
1
7
85.7%
3
1
4
75.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
30
2006
21
8
29
72.4%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
31
2007
13
1
14
92.9%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
32
2008
18
4
22
81.8%
4
1
5
80.0%
1
1
2
50.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Career
—
471
116
587
80.2%
106
33
139
76.3%
55
16
71
77.5%
79
26
105
75.2%
—
85
81
166
51.2%
105
58
163
64.4%
11
10
21
52.4%
61
43
104
58.7%
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.