H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Jana Novotna H2H: 6-0

Lindsay Davenport holds a 6–0 lead over Jana Novotna in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 3–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 1999 Wimbledon quarterfinal 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
6 – 0
6 main draw meetings
Jana Novotna
CZE Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 2, 1999* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Lindsay Davenport #2 6-3 6-4 Jana Novotna #6 Match data
Nov 15, 1997* Philadelphia WTA 250 QF Carpet Lindsay Davenport #3 6-3 6-2 Jana Novotna #2 Match data
Oct 17, 1997* Zurich WTA 1000 SF Hard Lindsay Davenport #6 6-4 6-1 Jana Novotna #2 Match data
Sep 4, 1997* US Open Grand Slam QF Hard Lindsay Davenport #6 6-2 4-6 7-6 Jana Novotna #3 Match data
Oct 12, 1996* Filderstadt WTA 250 QF Hard Lindsay Davenport #6 6-3 6-4 Jana Novotna #8 Match data
Nov 14, 1994 Virginia Slims Championships WTA Finals QF Carpet Lindsay Davenport #7 6-2 6-2 Jana Novotna #4 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Jana Novotna #18 #2 5,063 2,224 504 198 71.8% 1 4 1 5 13 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Jana Novotna
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 1986 0–4 0.0% #171 1,466 0 0
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3 1987 21–17 55.3% #47 1,752 0 0
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4 1988 23–18 56.1% #35 1,757 0 1
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 1989 45–17 72.6% #11 1,962 0 2
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12 1990 40–16 71.4% #13 2,016 0 3
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 1991 45–15 75.0% #7 2,072 0 5
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25 1992 36–17 67.9% #10 2,089 0 5
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29 1993 46–15 75.4% #6 2,103 0 7
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36 1994 43–11 79.6% #4 2,141 0 10
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36 1995 30–12 71.4% #11 2,031 0 11
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37 1996 47–12 79.7% #5 2,209 0 15
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44 1997 52–15 77.6% #2 2,173 0 19
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50 1998 50–14 78.1% #3 2,129 1 23
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50 1999 26–15 63.4% #18 1,924 1 24
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52 — — — — — — —
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54 — — — — — — —