H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Jelena Kostanic Tosic H2H: 1-0

Lindsay Davenport holds a 1–0 lead over Jelena Kostanic Tosic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lindsay Davenport leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2006 US Open second round 6-0 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Jelena Kostanic Tosic
CRO Age 45 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lindsay Davenport #11 6-0 6-0 Jelena Kostanic Tosic #71 Match data Aug 31, 2006* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,374 711 191 78.8% 3 1 11 1 26 13 55
Jelena Kostanic Tosic #937 #32 900 1,709 112 152 42.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Jelena Kostanic Tosic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,512 0 0 1998 1–2 33.3% #240 1,490 0 0
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 1999 4–5 44.4% #97 1,512 0 0
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,041 0 3 2000 10–13 43.5% #114 1,523 0 0
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,964 0 4 2001 4–4 50.0% #131 1,559 0 0
20 1996 47–15 75.8% #9 2,065 0 7 2002 14–17 45.2% #70 1,571 0 0
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,166 0 13 2003 16–20 44.4% #66 1,621 0 0
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,286 1 19 2004 22–26 45.8% #35 1,665 0 0
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,327 2 26 2005 11–21 34.4% #87 1,546 0 0
24 2000 57–14 80.3% #2 2,253 3 30 2006 19–18 51.4% #51 1,576 0 0
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,298 3 37 2007 10–17 37.0% #103 1,534 0 0
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,165 3 37 2008 1–5 16.7% #114 1,512 0 0
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,074 3 38 — — — — — — —
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,208 3 45 2010 0–4 0.0% #830 1,472 0 0
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,215 3 51 — — — — — — —
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,132 3 51 — — — — — — —
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,156 3 53 — — — — — — —
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,111 3 55 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lindsay Davenport Jelena Kostanic Tosic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1991 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1992 2 2 4 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
17 1993 18 8 26 69.2% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1999 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1994 21 6 27 77.8% 12 4 16 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2000 4 3 7 57.1% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1995 15 8 23 65.2% 8 1 9 88.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — —
20 1996 29 6 35 82.9% 9 1 10 90.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 2002 7 8 15 46.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1997 36 8 44 81.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 2003 6 9 15 40.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1998 43 7 50 86.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 2004 11 18 29 37.9% 11 6 17 64.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
23 1999 33 8 41 80.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 7 0 7 100.0% 9 1 10 90.0% 2005 2 10 12 16.7% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2000 41 9 50 82.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9% 2006 18 14 32 56.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 2001 51 9 60 85.0% — — — — 9 1 10 90.0% 4 0 4 100.0% 2007 9 11 20 45.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2002 21 8 29 72.4% — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2003 30 10 40 75.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 40 5 45 88.9% 13 3 16 81.3% 5 1 6 83.3% 6 1 7 85.7% 2010 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2005 38 7 45 84.4% 11 2 13 84.6% 6 1 7 85.7% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 21 8 29 72.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 13 1 14 92.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 18 4 22 81.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 471 116 587 80.2% 106 33 139 76.3% 55 16 71 77.5% 79 26 105 75.2% — 58 81 139 41.7% 51 55 106 48.1% 1 11 12 8.3% 2 5 7 28.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 114/278 of Lindsay Davenport's and 47/190 of Jelena Kostanic Tosic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lindsay Davenport Jelena Kostanic Tosic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 4/36 0.5 3.0 64.8% 51.0% 50.9% 32.3% 40.3% 50.9% 36.3%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 6/48 0.5 2.5 66.8% 51.0% 50.3% 56.5% 44.0% 50.4% 40.8%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 5/32 1.6 3.8 67.1% 63.2% 35.8% 50.5% 43.7% 53.6% 40.1%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 8/37 1.5 2.6 67.9% 56.8% 43.5% 51.7% 53.3% 51.9% 38.7%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 17/27 1.6 3.1 67.6% 61.5% 44.5% 53.1% 41.7% 56.0% 38.3%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 3/6 1.7 2.3 63.3% 62.0% 51.1% 65.9% 10.0% 58.1% 29.2%
27 2003 13/63 3.1 3.8 57.5% 72.0% 48.9% 70.1% 61.3% 62.1% 50.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 20/74 4.7 3.3 61.0% 76.7% 48.0% 71.2% 55.1% 65.5% 51.1% 2010 4/4 1.0 4.5 64.0% 46.6% 41.6% 36.1% 38.8% 44.8% 36.4%
29 2005 28/69 5.6 5.0 59.7% 73.5% 46.4% 56.5% 54.0% 62.4% 48.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 19/29 3.9 3.5 57.9% 67.9% 53.5% 56.9% 47.3% 61.8% 47.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 9/14 4.9 3.6 57.3% 72.4% 53.0% 46.7% 63.5% 64.0% 52.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 25/29 6.0 4.0 58.0% 74.4% 51.4% 48.4% 54.3% 65.2% 47.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 114/902 4.9 4.0 58.8% 73.1% 49.8% 58.1% 54.7% 63.6% 49.2% — 47/264 1.3 3.1 66.7% 57.4% 44.8% 50.6% 41.8% 53.1% 38.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lindsay Davenport Jelena Kostanic Tosic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1991 1505 103.8 — — — — +36 — — 28.6% -1.71 1–0 — — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1992 1512 119.7 — — — — +67 0 — 31.3% -1.38 1–1 — — -0.26 1998 1491 103.8 — — — — — +41 — 42.9% +0.43 0–1 0–1 — +0.18
17 1993 1859 149.8 — — — — -28 -178 -240 61.3% +0.93 11–3 (79%) 4–4 (50%) 111.2 -0.48 1999 1512 116.4 — — — — +24 +37 — 45.5% -0.14 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +0.26
18 1994 2041 168.7 — — — — -27 -191 -346 69.7% +1.73 11–7 (61%) 6–5 (55%) 102.2 -2.86 2000 1524 108.3 — — — — +37 +30 — 42.0% -0.68 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 105.1 +0.85
19 1995 1964 155.1 — — — — -15 -55 -216 64.4% +1.21 10–5 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 100.2 +0.77 2001 1560 116.2 — — — — — +73 — 47.1% +0.18 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 101.0 -0.13
20 1996 2066 172.6 — — — — +4 -68 -253 73.5% +1.73 6–6 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 100.5 -1.62 2002 1571 111.3 — — — — -20 +34 — 42.5% -0.31 8–3 (73%) 2–5 (29%) 105.9 +0.28
21 1997 2166 175.6 — — — — +24 -154 — 74.4% +1.95 10–10 (50%) 7–8 (47%) 94.6 +0.58 2003 1622 120.1 -1.74 -2.49 0.739 43.5% -56 +59 — 45.1% -0.46 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 97.7 -0.06
22 1998 2287 180.4 — — — — +50 -220 -395 75.7% +1.94 16–7 (70%) 8–5 (62%) 105.2 -2.47 2004 1666 129.7 -1.40 -1.09 0.823 45.7% -81 +96 — 45.4% -0.19 9–7 (56%) 6–5 (55%) 105.6 -0.69
23 1999 2328 179.8 — — — — +19 -263 -303 82.2% +2.53 8–4 (67%) 7–2 (78%) 101.9 -1.25 2005 1547 120.0 -0.58 -1.27 0.864 46.7% -47 +195 — 37.0% -0.73 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 99.4 +0.09
24 2000 2254 177.5 — — — — +41 — -106 76.8% +2.17 13–6 (68%) 8–8 (50%) 96.4 -2.76 2006 1577 119.3 -2.62 -2.72 0.804 45.9% +30 — -175 50.6% -0.05 6–5 (55%) 3–2 (60%) 100.9 +1.44
25 2001 2298 174.7 — — — — +17 — -24 81.0% +2.19 13–4 (76%) 9–4 (69%) 103.0 -1.06 2007 1534 105.5 -0.32 -3.82 0.871 47.4% +40 +66 — 38.6% -1.12 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — -0.47
26 2002 2166 166.9 — — — — +25 — — 71.1% +1.46 4–6 (40%) 7–5 (58%) 90.6 -0.63 2008 1513 110.2 +2.02 -2.68 0.696 44.8% — +50 — 22.2% -1.78 1–0 2–0 — -0.46
27 2003 2075 165.9 +4.70 +4.45 1.328 56.1% +52 +20 +133 74.6% +1.95 10–6 (63%) 5–5 (50%) 96.2 -0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 2208 171.1 +7.65 +5.05 1.482 57.9% +54 -118 +45 83.1% +2.56 7–3 (70%) 5–3 (63%) 100.2 -0.46 2010 1472 103.1 -1.62 -2.01 0.660 40.8% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — -0.15
29 2005 2215 170.5 +5.92 +4.60 1.294 55.2% +26 -49 +49 79.2% +2.00 16–6 (73%) 9–7 (56%) 103.6 -1.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 2133 165.6 +4.92 +4.20 1.241 54.4% +19 — — 71.9% +1.67 4–4 (50%) 7–2 (78%) 97.4 -1.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 2157 145.6 +4.78 +3.86 1.472 58.3% +12 — — 83.9% +2.65 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — -0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 2112 144.2 +7.49 +3.10 1.375 56.0% -6 +44 — 80.0% +2.18 5–0 (100%) 1–1 — -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2375 176.5 +6.17 +4.21 1.351 56.0% +22 -122 -126 74.8% +1.90 149–78 (66%) 95–72 (57%) 101.9 -1.91 — 1710 121.9 -0.96 -2.67 0.809 45.8% -15 +80 -175 42.8% -0.47 42–33 (56%) 24–27 (47%) 105.1 +0.43

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.