H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Joannette Kruger H2H: 2-1

Lindsay Davenport holds a 2–1 lead over Joannette Kruger in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Lindsay Davenport leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 1997 Chicago fourth round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Joannette Kruger
RSA Age 52 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 7, 1997* Chicago WTA 250 R16 Carpet Lindsay Davenport #5 6-2 6-4 Joannette Kruger #31 Match data
May 28, 1997* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Lindsay Davenport #5 6-2 6-3 Joannette Kruger #79 Match data
Sep 29, 1995* Leipzig WTA 250 R16 Carpet Joannette Kruger #37 4-6 6-4 6-2 Lindsay Davenport #9 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Joannette Kruger #972 #21 1,280 1,879 147 162 47.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Joannette Kruger
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3 1992 2–3 40.0% #96 1,508 0 0
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4 1993 9–13 40.9% #128 1,575 0 0
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 1994 13–17 43.3% #79 1,638 0 0
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12 1995 19–15 55.9% #30 1,725 0 1
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 1996 7–12 36.8% #126 1,646 0 1
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25 1997 25–18 58.1% #27 1,791 0 2
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29 1998 25–22 53.2% #30 1,721 0 2
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36 1999 9–13 40.9% #129 1,650 0 2
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36 2000 16–17 48.5% #59 1,659 0 2
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37 2001 21–23 47.7% #46 1,643 0 2
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44 2002 1–4 20.0% #455 1,591 0 2
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50 2003 0–5 0.0% #853 1,531 0 2
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50 — — — — — — —
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52 — — — — — — —
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54 — — — — — — —