H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Judith Wiesner H2H: 4-2

Lindsay Davenport holds a 4–2 lead over Judith Wiesner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 2–1 on clay and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 1996 Strasbourg semifinal 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Judith Wiesner
AUT Age 60 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 25, 1996* Strasbourg WTA 500 SF Clay Lindsay Davenport #10 6-2 6-3 Judith Wiesner #27 Match data
Mar 12, 1996* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #12 7-6 6-1 Judith Wiesner #26 Match data
May 27, 1995* Strasbourg WTA 500 QF Clay Lindsay Davenport #7 2-6 6-4 7-5 Judith Wiesner #22 Match data
Feb 26, 1994* Indian Wells WTA 1000 QF Hard Lindsay Davenport #13 4-6 7-6 6-0 Judith Wiesner #20 Match data
May 26, 1993* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Judith Wiesner #26 6-3 6-1 Lindsay Davenport #25 Match data
Mar 14, 1993* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R64 Hard Judith Wiesner #25 6-4 6-2 Lindsay Davenport #48 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Judith Wiesner #48 #12 1,590 1,979 302 177 63.0% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Judith Wiesner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3 — — — — — — —
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4 1985 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 1986 3–3 50.0% #141 1,514 0 0
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12 1987 19–13 59.4% #33 1,696 0 0
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 1988 22–17 56.4% #33 1,751 0 1
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25 1989 22–14 61.1% #35 1,736 0 2
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29 1990 41–19 68.3% #17 1,845 0 2
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36 1991 28–14 66.7% #16 1,962 0 2
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36 1992 29–17 63.0% #25 1,916 0 3
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37 1993 30–17 63.8% #21 1,906 0 3
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44 1994 28–15 65.1% #25 1,893 0 4
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50 1995 28–14 66.7% #25 1,914 0 5
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50 1996 35–22 61.4% #15 1,925 0 5
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52 1997 17–11 60.7% #48 1,829 0 5
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54 — — — — — — —