Home
/
H2H
/
Lindsay Davenport vs Julie Halard-Decugis
H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Lindsay Davenport vs Julie Halard-Decugis H2H: 8-2
Lindsay Davenport holds an 8–2 lead over Julie Halard-Decugis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 6–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2000 Indian Wells Open round of 16 6-2 6-1.
Quick comparisons
Aryna Sabalenka vs Iga Swiatek Aryna Sabalenka vs Elena Rybakina
Serena Williams vs Venus Williams Martina Navratilova vs Chris Evert
Want to explore more matchups?
Advanced rivalry search
lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
8
–
2
10 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 55
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
Player Score Player Match Data Date Round Tournament Category Surface
Lindsay Davenport
#2
6-2 6-1
Julie Halard-Decugis
#10
Match data
Mar 18, 2000*
R16
Indian Wells Open
Tier I
→
modern equivalent
WTA 1000
Hard
Lindsay Davenport
#2
6-1 6-2
Julie Halard-Decugis
#11
Match data
Jan 27, 2000*
QF
Australian Open
Grand Slam
Hard
Lindsay Davenport
#2
4-6 6-2 6-1
Julie Halard-Decugis
#9
Match data
Nov 13, 1999*
QF
Philadelphia
Tier II
→
modern equivalent
WTA 500
Carpet
Lindsay Davenport
#2
6-1 6-2
Julie Halard-Decugis
#11
Match data
Sep 7, 1999*
R16
US Open
Grand Slam
Hard
Julie Halard-Decugis
#16
6-3 7-5
Lindsay Davenport
#2
Match data
Aug 14, 1999*
SF
Manhattan Beach
Tier II
→
modern equivalent
WTA 500
Hard
Lindsay Davenport
#1
6-4 6-2
Julie Halard-Decugis
#26
Match data
Oct 16, 1998*
R16
Zurich
Tier I
→
modern equivalent
WTA 1000
Hard
Lindsay Davenport
#2
6-0 6-4
Julie Halard-Decugis
#34
Match data
Aug 14, 1998*
R16
Manhattan Beach
Tier II
→
modern equivalent
WTA 500
Hard
Lindsay Davenport
#2
6-3 6-3
Julie Halard-Decugis
#285
Match data
Feb 27, 1998*
R16
Oklahoma
Tier III
→
modern equivalent
WTA 250
Hard
Lindsay Davenport
#9
6-1 6-4
Julie Halard-Decugis
#18
Match data
Jun 22, 1994*
R128
Wimbledon
Grand Slam
Grass
Julie Halard-Decugis
#24
6-4 6-2
Lindsay Davenport
#11
Match data
May 29, 1994*
R32
Roland Garros
Grand Slam
Clay
*
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category.
Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories.
Mapping details.
Career Comparison
Player
Current
Peak
Pts
Elo
W
L
Win %
GS
Olympics
1000* including documented historical predecessor categories
Finals
500* including documented historical predecessor categories
250* including documented historical predecessor categories
Titles
Lindsay Davenport
#35
#1
6,100
2,374
711
191
78.8%
3
1
11
1
26
13
55
Julie Halard-Decugis
#15
#7
2,030
2,024
340
221
60.6%
0
0
0
0
2
10
12
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
Yr W-L Win % Rank Elo GS Titles
Yr W-L Win % Rank Elo GS Titles
15
1991
1–2
33.3%
#348
1,504
0
0
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
16
1992
2–5
28.6%
#161
1,512
0
0
1987
9–5
64.3%
#62
1,643
0
0
17
1993
31–15
67.4%
#20
1,858
0
1
1988
11–15
42.3%
#75
1,612
0
0
18
1994
44–15
74.6%
#6
2,041
0
3
1989
10–16
38.5%
#118
1,624
0
0
19
1995
31–14
68.9%
#12
1,964
0
4
1990
20–16
55.6%
#41
1,707
0
0
20
1996
47–15
75.8%
#9
2,065
0
7
1991
44–23
65.7%
#20
1,820
0
1
21
1997
57–16
78.1%
#3
2,166
0
13
1992
23–14
62.2%
#27
1,819
0
2
22
1998
68–14
82.9%
#1
2,286
1
19
1993
26–18
59.1%
#29
1,819
0
2
23
1999
58–11
84.1%
#2
2,327
2
26
1994
38–21
64.4%
#21
1,889
0
3
24
2000
57–14
80.3%
#2
2,253
3
30
1995
19–15
55.9%
#50
1,770
0
4
25
2001
64–10
86.5%
#1
2,298
3
37
1996
28–10
73.7%
#20
1,856
0
6
26
2002
24–9
72.7%
#12
2,165
3
37
1997
0–1
0.0%
#178
1,843
0
6
27
2003
48–15
76.2%
#5
2,074
3
38
1998
34–21
61.8%
#22
1,916
0
8
28
2004
64–10
86.5%
#1
2,208
3
45
1999
47–22
68.1%
#9
1,930
0
10
29
2005
58–11
84.1%
#1
2,215
3
51
2000
31–24
56.4%
#15
1,837
0
12
30
2006
21–8
72.4%
#25
2,132
3
51
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
31
2007
13–1
92.9%
#72
2,156
3
53
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
32
2008
23–6
79.3%
#35
2,111
3
55
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year.
Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
Yr
Yr
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
15
1991
1
2
3
33.3%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
16
1992
2
2
4
50.0%
0
3
3
0.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1987
2
1
3
66.7%
6
3
9
66.7%
—
—
—
—
1
1
2
50.0%
17
1993
18
8
26
69.2%
8
3
11
72.7%
2
2
4
50.0%
3
2
5
60.0%
1988
3
4
7
42.9%
6
5
11
54.5%
2
4
6
33.3%
0
2
2
0.0%
18
1994
21
6
27
77.8%
12
4
16
75.0%
4
1
5
80.0%
7
4
11
63.6%
1989
2
5
7
28.6%
5
9
14
35.7%
1
1
2
50.0%
2
1
3
66.7%
19
1995
15
8
23
65.2%
8
1
9
88.9%
3
1
4
75.0%
5
4
9
55.6%
1990
10
6
16
62.5%
9
5
14
64.3%
1
2
3
33.3%
0
3
3
0.0%
20
1996
29
6
35
82.9%
9
1
10
90.0%
2
2
4
50.0%
7
6
13
53.8%
1991
26
13
39
66.7%
13
6
19
68.4%
3
2
5
60.0%
2
2
4
50.0%
21
1997
36
8
44
81.8%
10
4
14
71.4%
1
1
2
50.0%
10
3
13
76.9%
1992
4
6
10
40.0%
16
5
21
76.2%
3
1
4
75.0%
0
2
2
0.0%
22
1998
43
7
50
86.0%
11
4
15
73.3%
4
1
5
80.0%
10
2
12
83.3%
1993
19
11
30
63.3%
4
5
9
44.4%
0
1
1
0.0%
3
1
4
75.0%
23
1999
33
8
41
80.5%
9
2
11
81.8%
7
0
7
100.0%
9
1
10
90.0%
1994
19
14
33
57.6%
14
3
17
82.4%
0
1
1
0.0%
5
3
8
62.5%
24
2000
41
9
50
82.0%
1
2
3
33.3%
7
2
9
77.8%
8
1
9
88.9%
1995
8
8
16
50.0%
9
3
12
75.0%
0
1
1
0.0%
2
3
5
40.0%
25
2001
51
9
60
85.0%
—
—
—
—
9
1
10
90.0%
4
0
4
100.0%
1996
13
4
17
76.5%
11
4
15
73.3%
—
—
—
—
4
2
6
66.7%
26
2002
21
8
29
72.4%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
3
1
4
75.0%
1997
0
1
1
0.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
27
2003
30
10
40
75.0%
10
3
13
76.9%
4
2
6
66.7%
4
0
4
100.0%
1998
18
12
30
60.0%
9
6
15
60.0%
7
1
8
87.5%
0
2
2
0.0%
28
2004
40
5
45
88.9%
13
3
16
81.3%
5
1
6
83.3%
6
1
7
85.7%
1999
22
11
33
66.7%
13
4
17
76.5%
7
1
8
87.5%
5
6
11
45.5%
29
2005
38
7
45
84.4%
11
2
13
84.6%
6
1
7
85.7%
3
1
4
75.0%
2000
18
13
31
58.1%
2
4
6
33.3%
7
2
9
77.8%
4
5
9
44.4%
30
2006
21
8
29
72.4%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
31
2007
13
1
14
92.9%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
32
2008
18
4
22
81.8%
4
1
5
80.0%
1
1
2
50.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Career
—
471
116
587
80.2%
106
33
139
76.3%
55
16
71
77.5%
79
26
105
75.2%
—
164
109
273
60.1%
117
62
179
65.4%
31
17
48
64.6%
28
33
61
45.9%
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.