H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Lindsay Davenport vs Katarina Srebotnik H2H: 4-0
Lindsay Davenport holds a 4–0 lead over Katarina Srebotnik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2006 US Open third round 3-6 6-3 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 45
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2006* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Lindsay Davenport | 3-6 6-3 7-6(5) | Katarina Srebotnik | Match data |
| Aug 24, 2006* | New Haven | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-3 6-3 | Katarina Srebotnik | Match data |
| May 25, 2005* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Lindsay Davenport | 3-6 6-2 6-2 | Katarina Srebotnik | Match data |
| May 22, 2004* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | QF | Clay | Lindsay Davenport | 6-0 6-1 | Katarina Srebotnik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lindsay Davenport | #35 | #1 | 6,100 | 2,353 | 704 | 190 | 78.7% | 3 | 13 | 1 | 25 | 12 | 54 |
| Katarina Srebotnik | #704 | #20 | 2,474 | 1,845 | 224 | 204 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lindsay Davenport | Katarina Srebotnik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #348 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1992 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #161 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1993 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #20 | 1,858 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1994 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #6 | 2,022 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1995 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #12 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #120 | 1,484 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1996 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #9 | 2,013 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #97 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1997 | 57–16 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,161 | 0 | 12 | 2002 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1998 | 68–14 | 82.9% | #1 | 2,283 | 1 | 18 | 2003 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1999 | 58–11 | 84.1% | #2 | 2,297 | 2 | 25 | 2004 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #87 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2000 | 56–13 | 81.2% | #2 | 2,228 | 3 | 29 | 2005 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #27 | 1,752 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2001 | 64–10 | 86.5% | #1 | 2,275 | 3 | 36 | 2006 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #23 | 1,786 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2002 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #12 | 2,153 | 3 | 36 | 2007 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,756 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2003 | 48–15 | 76.2% | #5 | 2,076 | 3 | 37 | 2008 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #20 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2004 | 64–10 | 86.5% | #1 | 2,203 | 3 | 44 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #428 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2005 | 58–11 | 84.1% | #1 | 2,199 | 3 | 50 | 2010 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #317 | 1,621 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2006 | 21–8 | 72.4% | #25 | 2,122 | 3 | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2007 | 13–1 | 92.9% | #72 | 2,147 | 3 | 52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2008 | 23–6 | 79.3% | #35 | 2,063 | 3 | 54 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |