H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Lindsay Davenport vs Larisa Savchenko H2H: 1-1
Lindsay Davenport and Larisa Savchenko are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 1998 Wimbledon second round 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
URS
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 1998* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Lindsay Davenport | 6-1 7-5 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
| Jun 28, 1996* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Larisa Savchenko | 6-3 6-2 | Lindsay Davenport | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lindsay Davenport | #35 | #1 | 6,100 | 2,353 | 704 | 190 | 78.7% | 3 | 13 | 1 | 25 | 12 | 54 |
| Larisa Savchenko | #305 | #13 | 454 | 1,926 | 238 | 239 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lindsay Davenport | Larisa Savchenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #348 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #161 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #20 | 1,858 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #55 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #6 | 2,022 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #12 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #9 | 2,013 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 57–16 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,161 | 0 | 12 | 1989 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,887 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 68–14 | 82.9% | #1 | 2,283 | 1 | 18 | 1990 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #91 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 58–11 | 84.1% | #2 | 2,297 | 2 | 25 | 1991 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 56–13 | 81.2% | #2 | 2,228 | 3 | 29 | 1992 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 64–10 | 86.5% | #1 | 2,275 | 3 | 36 | 1993 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 2002 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #12 | 2,153 | 3 | 36 | 1994 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #41 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 |
| 2003 | 48–15 | 76.2% | #5 | 2,076 | 3 | 37 | 1995 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #99 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 2004 | 64–10 | 86.5% | #1 | 2,203 | 3 | 44 | 1996 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #61 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 2005 | 58–11 | 84.1% | #1 | 2,199 | 3 | 50 | 1997 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 2006 | 21–8 | 72.4% | #25 | 2,122 | 3 | 50 | 1998 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 2007 | 13–1 | 92.9% | #72 | 2,147 | 3 | 52 | 1999 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 |
| 2008 | 23–6 | 79.3% | #35 | 2,063 | 3 | 54 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |