H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Laura Golarsa H2H: 2-0

Lindsay Davenport holds a 2–0 lead over Laura Golarsa in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 1999 Wimbledon third round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Laura Golarsa
ITA Age 58 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 27, 1999* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Lindsay Davenport #2 6-3 6-2 Laura Golarsa #122 Match data
Mar 23, 1996* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R64 Hard Lindsay Davenport #12 6-1 6-2 Laura Golarsa #151 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Laura Golarsa #693 #39 436 1,761 127 180 41.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Laura Golarsa
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 1985 5–1 83.3% #166 1,563 0 1
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3 1986 5–5 50.0% #167 1,593 0 1
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4 1987 6–10 37.5% #121 1,575 0 1
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 1988 11–14 44.0% #79 1,619 0 1
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12 1989 22–18 55.0% #58 1,706 0 1
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 1990 14–16 46.7% #61 1,689 0 1
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25 1991 3–13 18.8% #213 1,546 0 1
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29 1992 5–10 33.3% #125 1,522 0 1
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36 1993 17–18 48.6% #69 1,637 0 1
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36 1994 13–22 37.1% #112 1,582 0 1
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37 1995 5–10 33.3% #149 1,551 0 1
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44 1996 1–8 11.1% #145 1,468 0 1
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50 1997 7–9 43.8% #62 1,532 0 1
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50 1998 10–16 38.5% #94 1,570 0 1
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52 1999 3–10 23.1% #168 1,513 0 1
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54 — — — — — — —