H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Laura Granville H2H: 3-0

Lindsay Davenport holds a 3–0 lead over Laura Granville in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2008 Auckland third round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Laura Granville
USA Age 45 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 3, 2008* Auckland WTA 250 R32 Hard Lindsay Davenport #72 6-2 6-3 Laura Granville #61 Match data
Mar 9, 2006* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Lindsay Davenport #4 6-4 6-0 Laura Granville #52 Match data
Jan 25, 2004* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Lindsay Davenport #5 6-4 6-0 Laura Granville #54 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Laura Granville #466 #28 1,063 1,722 86 108 44.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Laura Granville
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 1998 1–1 50.0% — 1,512 0 0
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3 1999 0–1 0.0% #841 1,501 0 0
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4 — — — — — — —
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 2001 0–3 0.0% #220 1,485 0 0
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12 2002 11–10 52.4% #49 1,637 0 0
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 2003 22–22 50.0% #46 1,651 0 0
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25 2004 17–19 47.2% #74 1,612 0 0
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29 2005 12–15 44.4% #60 1,616 0 0
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36 2006 12–16 42.9% #68 1,590 0 0
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36 2007 11–15 42.3% #61 1,611 0 0
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37 2008 0–2 0.0% #379 1,592 0 0
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44 2009 0–2 0.0% #293 1,564 0 0
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50 2010 0–2 0.0% #448 1,541 0 0
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50 — — — — — — —
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52 — — — — — — —
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54 — — — — — — —