H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Lilia Osterloh H2H: 2-0

Lindsay Davenport holds a 2–0 lead over Lilia Osterloh in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2004 Cincinnati fourth round 4-6 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Lilia Osterloh
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 20, 2004* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #4 4-6 6-4 6-1 Lilia Osterloh #137 Match data
Mar 24, 2001* Miami WTA 1000 R32 Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 6-2 6-0 Lilia Osterloh #52 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Lilia Osterloh #1,223 #41 738 1,697 83 138 37.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Lilia Osterloh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3 1996 1–1 50.0% #195 1,518 0 0
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4 1997 2–2 50.0% #170 1,551 0 0
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 1998 0–5 0.0% #120 1,501 0 0
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12 1999 9–13 40.9% #79 1,545 0 0
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 2000 15–19 44.1% #43 1,595 0 0
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25 2001 23–25 47.9% #53 1,659 0 0
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29 2002 7–18 28.0% #156 1,535 0 0
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36 2003 0–2 0.0% #180 1,509 0 0
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36 2004 4–5 44.4% #119 1,561 0 0
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37 2005 2–9 18.2% #144 1,488 0 0
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44 2006 6–8 42.9% #118 1,509 0 0
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50 2007 7–12 36.8% #91 1,543 0 0
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50 2008 3–10 23.1% #230 1,486 0 0
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52 2009 3–3 50.0% #136 1,510 0 0
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54 2010 1–6 14.3% #237 1,467 0 0