H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Linda Wild H2H: 1-1

Lindsay Davenport and Linda Wild are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Linda Wild won the 1996 US Open round of 16 6-2 3-6 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Linda Wild
USA Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Linda Wild #32 6-2 3-6 6-0 Lindsay Davenport #8 Match data Sep 3, 1996* R16 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Lindsay Davenport #13 6-3 6-1 Linda Wild #50 Match data Mar 13, 1994* R64 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,374 711 191 78.8% 3 1 11 1 26 13 55
Linda Wild #252 #23 823 1,815 135 146 48.0% 0 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Lindsay Davenport Linda Wild
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,512 0 0 1989 1–7 12.5% #155 1,457 0 0
1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 1990 9–12 42.9% #86 1,554 0 0
1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,041 0 3 1991 20–19 51.3% #41 1,720 0 0
1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,964 0 4 1992 19–21 47.5% #49 1,732 0 0
1996 47–15 75.8% #9 2,065 0 7 1993 24–18 57.1% #45 1,764 0 2
1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,166 0 13 1994 20–19 51.3% #49 1,740 0 2
1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,286 1 19 1995 17–13 56.7% #58 1,758 0 4
1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,327 2 26 1996 22–16 57.9% #29 1,809 0 5
2000 57–14 80.3% #2 2,253 3 30 1997 3–14 17.6% #223 1,625 0 5
2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,298 3 37 1999 0–3 0.0% #191 1,566 0 5
2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,165 3 37 2000 0–3 0.0% #252 1,540 0 5
2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,074 3 38 — — — — — — —
2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,208 3 45 — — — — — — —
2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,215 3 51 — — — — — — —
2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,132 3 51 — — — — — — —
2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,156 3 53 — — — — — — —
2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,111 3 55 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Lindsay Davenport Linda Wild
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1991 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1992 2 2 4 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — — — — — — — — —
1993 18 8 26 69.2% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
1994 21 6 27 77.8% 12 4 16 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 1991 8 9 17 47.1% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
1995 15 8 23 65.2% 8 1 9 88.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1992 8 10 18 44.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
1996 29 6 35 82.9% 9 1 10 90.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1993 15 9 24 62.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0%
1997 36 8 44 81.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 1994 9 11 20 45.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 3 3 6 50.0%
1998 43 7 50 86.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 1995 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8%
1999 33 8 41 80.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 7 0 7 100.0% 9 1 10 90.0% 1996 15 10 25 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
2000 41 9 50 82.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9% 1997 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
2001 51 9 60 85.0% — — — — 9 1 10 90.0% 4 0 4 100.0% 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
2002 21 8 29 72.4% — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
2003 30 10 40 75.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2004 40 5 45 88.9% 13 3 16 81.3% 5 1 6 83.3% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2005 38 7 45 84.4% 11 2 13 84.6% 6 1 7 85.7% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2006 21 8 29 72.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2007 13 1 14 92.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2008 18 4 22 81.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 471 116 587 80.2% 106 33 139 76.3% 55 16 71 77.5% 79 26 105 75.2% Career 70 79 149 47.0% 19 30 49 38.8% 19 19 38 50.0% 27 18 45 60.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Lindsay Davenport Linda Wild
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1991 1505 103.8 — — — — +36 — — 28.6% -1.71 1–0 — — -0.02 1972 1493 98.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.09
1992 1512 119.7 — — — — +67 0 — 31.3% -1.38 1–1 — — -0.26 1989 1457 103.4 — — — — +30 — — 17.6% -2.06 0–1 — — -0.09
1993 1859 149.8 — — — — -28 -178 -240 61.3% +0.93 11–3 (79%) 4–4 (50%) 111.2 -0.48 1990 1555 123.6 — — — — +1 -3 — 43.2% -0.52 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 104.4 -0.32
1994 2041 168.7 — — — — -27 -191 -346 69.7% +1.73 11–7 (61%) 6–5 (55%) 102.2 -2.86 1991 1721 134.6 — — — — -71 -49 -115 50.0% -0.26 8–4 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 107.4 -0.67
1995 1964 155.1 — — — — -15 -55 -216 64.4% +1.21 10–5 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 100.2 +0.77 1992 1733 139.7 — — — — -89 -75 +45 47.8% -0.05 6–6 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 103.9 -1.52
1996 2066 172.6 — — — — +4 -68 -253 73.5% +1.73 6–6 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 100.5 -1.62 1993 1765 132.8 — — — — +27 -174 -41 56.4% +0.47 7–5 (58%) 3–4 (43%) 99.5 +0.50
1997 2166 175.6 — — — — +24 -154 — 74.4% +1.95 10–10 (50%) 7–8 (47%) 94.6 +0.58 1994 1741 132.8 — — — — -38 -164 +80 51.6% -0.05 8–9 (47%) 6–4 (60%) 98.6 -1.90
1998 2287 180.4 — — — — +50 -220 -395 75.7% +1.94 16–7 (70%) 8–5 (62%) 105.2 -2.47 1995 1758 128.9 — — — — +19 -201 +14 58.0% +0.57 3–6 (33%) 4–4 (50%) 96.1 +1.45
1999 2328 179.8 — — — — +19 -263 -303 82.2% +2.53 8–4 (67%) 7–2 (78%) 101.9 -1.25 1996 1810 144.4 — — — — +25 -227 -22 55.2% +0.55 7–6 (54%) 6–8 (43%) 101.6 +0.67
2000 2254 177.5 — — — — +41 — -106 76.8% +2.17 13–6 (68%) 8–8 (50%) 96.4 -2.76 1997 1625 106.2 — — — — +96 -90 +72 25.6% -2.15 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 95.7 +0.19
2001 2298 174.7 — — — — +17 — -24 81.0% +2.19 13–4 (76%) 9–4 (69%) 103.0 -1.06 1999 1567 91.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.38
2002 2166 166.9 — — — — +25 — — 71.1% +1.46 4–6 (40%) 7–5 (58%) 90.6 -0.63 2000 1541 109.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.42
2003 2075 165.9 +4.70 +4.45 1.328 56.1% +52 +20 +133 74.6% +1.95 10–6 (63%) 5–5 (50%) 96.2 -0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2004 2208 171.1 +7.65 +5.05 1.482 57.9% +54 -118 +45 83.1% +2.56 7–3 (70%) 5–3 (63%) 100.2 -0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2005 2215 170.5 +5.92 +4.60 1.294 55.2% +26 -49 +49 79.2% +2.00 16–6 (73%) 9–7 (56%) 103.6 -1.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2006 2133 165.6 +4.92 +4.20 1.241 54.4% +19 — — 71.9% +1.67 4–4 (50%) 7–2 (78%) 97.4 -1.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2007 2157 145.6 +4.78 +3.86 1.472 58.3% +12 — — 83.9% +2.65 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — -0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2008 2112 144.2 +7.49 +3.10 1.375 56.0% -6 +44 — 80.0% +2.18 5–0 (100%) 1–1 — -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 2375 176.5 +6.17 +4.21 1.351 56.0% +22 -122 -126 74.8% +1.90 149–78 (66%) 95–72 (57%) 101.9 -1.91 Career 1816 137.3 — — — — -7 -98 +18 48.5% -0.14 43–42 (51%) 31–29 (52%) 102.2 -0.65

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.