H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 2-1

Lindsay Davenport holds a 2–1 lead over Lori Mcneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Lori Mcneil leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 1998 US Open second round 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 3, 1998* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Lindsay Davenport #3 6-1 6-1 Lori Mcneil #101 Match data
Aug 27, 1997* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Lindsay Davenport #6 6-2 7-6 Lori Mcneil #199 Match data
Feb 12, 1994* Chicago WTA 250 QF Carpet Lori Mcneil #25 7-6 6-2 Lindsay Davenport #12 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,032 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,569 0 1
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,609 0 1
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,017 0 3
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,904 0 5
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,696 0 6
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,726 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,655 0 11
34 — — — — — — — 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,717 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,669 0 11