H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Magdalena Maleeva H2H: 3-3

Lindsay Davenport and Magdalena Maleeva are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 2–1 on carpet, while Magdalena Maleeva leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2004 Tokyo final 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Magdalena Maleeva
BUL Age 51 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 9, 2004* Tokyo WTA 1000 F Carpet Lindsay Davenport #4 6-4 6-1 Magdalena Maleeva #21 Match data
Oct 6, 2002* Moscow WTA 1000 F Carpet Magdalena Maleeva #23 5-7 6-3 7-6(4) Lindsay Davenport #8 Match data
Oct 27, 2001* Linz WTA 500 SF Hard Lindsay Davenport #3 6-2 6-2 Magdalena Maleeva #16 Match data
Aug 18, 2000* Montreal WTA 1000 R16 Hard Magdalena Maleeva #53 4-3 (ret.) Lindsay Davenport #2 Match data
Feb 5, 1995* Tokyo WTA 1000 SF Carpet Lindsay Davenport #6 6-3 6-2 Magdalena Maleeva #11 Match data
Jan 8, 1993* Brisbane WTA 500 R16 Hard Magdalena Maleeva #20 6-3 6-2 Lindsay Davenport #162 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Magdalena Maleeva #401 #4 1,834 2,083 384 272 58.5% 0 2 0 2 6 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Magdalena Maleeva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1989 1–3 25.0% #216 1,497 0 0
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 1990 12–10 54.5% #72 1,654 0 0
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0 1991 17–15 53.1% #38 1,718 0 0
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 1992 28–14 66.7% #20 1,908 0 1
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3 1993 36–16 69.2% #16 1,962 0 1
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4 1994 31–12 72.1% #11 1,980 0 3
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 1995 37–12 75.5% #6 2,029 0 6
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12 1996 18–15 54.5% #19 1,908 0 6
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 1997 21–22 48.8% #36 1,746 0 6
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25 1998 5–7 41.7% #116 1,713 0 6
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29 1999 12–8 60.0% #76 1,737 0 7
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36 2000 25–25 50.0% #23 1,813 0 7
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36 2001 35–24 59.3% #16 1,849 0 8
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37 2002 35–24 59.3% #14 1,855 0 9
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44 2003 27–21 56.2% #30 1,746 0 10
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50 2004 27–24 52.9% #25 1,710 0 10
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50 2005 17–20 45.9% #53 1,682 0 10
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52 — — — — — — —
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54 — — — — — — —