H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Maria Vento-Kabchi H2H: 3-0

Lindsay Davenport holds a 3–0 lead over Maria Vento-Kabchi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2004 Stanford semifinal 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Maria Vento-Kabchi
VEN Age 52 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 17, 2004* Stanford WTA 500 SF Hard Lindsay Davenport #5 6-3 6-2 Maria Vento-Kabchi #32 Match data
Feb 7, 2004* Tokyo WTA 1000 R16 Carpet Lindsay Davenport #6 6-2 6-1 Maria Vento-Kabchi #43 Match data
Jun 28, 1998* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Lindsay Davenport #2 6-3 1-6 6-2 Maria Vento-Kabchi #31 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Maria Vento-Kabchi #996 #26 1,053 1,716 95 156 37.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Maria Vento-Kabchi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3 1992 0–1 0.0% #551 1,496 0 0
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4 — — — — — — —
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 1994 3–6 33.3% #166 1,520 0 0
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12 1995 5–8 38.5% #86 1,551 0 0
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 1996 1–6 14.3% #139 1,504 0 0
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25 1997 11–7 61.1% #51 1,629 0 0
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29 1998 11–18 37.9% #43 1,653 0 0
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36 1999 3–16 15.8% #110 1,535 0 0
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36 2000 7–14 33.3% #104 1,537 0 0
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37 2001 4–7 36.4% #155 1,534 0 0
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44 2002 2–4 33.3% #172 1,512 0 0
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50 2003 15–8 65.2% #44 1,714 0 0
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50 2004 18–26 40.9% #48 1,628 0 0
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52 2005 13–23 36.1% #62 1,573 0 0
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54 2006 2–12 14.3% #324 1,461 0 0