H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Martina Hingis H2H: 14-11

Lindsay Davenport holds a 14–11 lead over Martina Hingis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 25 main-draw meetings, they are tied 8–8 on hard courts, while Lindsay Davenport leads 5–3 on carpet. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 2006 Indian Wells fourth round 6-3 1-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
14 – 11
25 main draw meetings
Martina Hingis
SUI Age 45 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 10, 2006* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R16 Hard Martina Hingis #32 6-3 1-6 6-2 Lindsay Davenport #4 Match data
Oct 13, 2001* Filderstadt WTA 500 SF Hard Lindsay Davenport #3 2-1 (ret.) Martina Hingis #1 Match data
Feb 4, 2001* Tokyo WTA 1000 F Carpet Lindsay Davenport #2 6-7(4) 6-4 6-2 Martina Hingis #1 Match data
Jan 13, 2001* Sydney WTA 500 F Hard Martina Hingis #1 6-3 4-6 7-5 Lindsay Davenport #2 Match data
Nov 10, 2000* Philadelphia WTA 500 F Carpet Lindsay Davenport #2 7-6(7) 6-4 Martina Hingis #1 Match data
Oct 15, 2000* Zurich WTA 1000 F Hard Martina Hingis #1 6-4 4-6 7-5 Lindsay Davenport #2 Match data
Mar 26, 2000* Miami WTA 1000 F Hard Martina Hingis #1 6-3 6-2 Lindsay Davenport #2 Match data
Mar 16, 2000* Indian Wells WTA 1000 F Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 4-6 6-4 6-0 Martina Hingis #1 Match data
Jan 30, 2000* Australian Open Grand Slam F Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 6-1 7-5 Martina Hingis #1 Match data
Nov 15, 1999 WTA Tour Championships WTA Finals F Carpet Lindsay Davenport #2 6-4 6-2 Martina Hingis #1 Match data
Nov 14, 1999* Philadelphia WTA 250 F Carpet Lindsay Davenport #2 6-3 6-4 Martina Hingis #1 Match data
Jan 17, 1999* Sydney WTA 500 F Hard Lindsay Davenport #1 6-4 6-3 Martina Hingis #2 Match data
Nov 16, 1998 WTA Tour Championships WTA Finals F Carpet Martina Hingis #2 7-5 6-4 4-6 6-2 Lindsay Davenport #1 Match data
Sep 13, 1998* US Open Grand Slam F Hard Lindsay Davenport #3 6-3 7-5 Martina Hingis #1 Match data
Aug 16, 1998* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 F Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 4-6 6-4 6-3 Martina Hingis #1 Match data
Mar 11, 1998* Indian Wells WTA 1000 F Hard Martina Hingis #1 6-3 6-4 Lindsay Davenport #2 Match data
Feb 9, 1998* Tokyo WTA 1000 F Carpet Lindsay Davenport #2 6-3 6-3 Martina Hingis #1 Match data
Nov 16, 1997* Philadelphia WTA 250 F Carpet Martina Hingis #1 7-5 6-7 7-6 Lindsay Davenport #3 Match data
Sep 6, 1997* US Open Grand Slam SF Hard Martina Hingis #1 6-2 6-4 Lindsay Davenport #6 Match data
Aug 9, 1997* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 SF Hard Lindsay Davenport #7 6-2 4-6 6-4 Martina Hingis #1 Match data
Jul 26, 1997* Stanford WTA 250 SF Hard Martina Hingis #1 6-3 1-6 6-2 Lindsay Davenport #7 Match data
Nov 2, 1996* Chicago WTA 250 QF Carpet Martina Hingis #8 6-3 6-7 6-2 Lindsay Davenport #6 Match data
Oct 12, 1996* Filderstadt WTA 250 SF Hard Martina Hingis #10 3-6 6-2 6-3 Lindsay Davenport #6 Match data
Jun 4, 1995* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Lindsay Davenport #6 4-6 6-2 6-2 Martina Hingis #23 Match data
Jan 13, 1995* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #7 6-1 3-6 6-3 Martina Hingis #87 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Martina Hingis #19 #1 6,976 2,385 515 126 80.3% 5 18 2 10 8 43

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Martina Hingis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1994 5–3 62.5% #87 1,595 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1995 18–12 60.0% #16 1,826 0 0
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 1996 45–15 75.0% #6 2,160 0 2
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0 1997 72–5 93.5% #1 2,321 3 14
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 1998 60–12 83.3% #2 2,264 4 19
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3 1999 70–12 85.4% #1 2,285 5 26
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4 2000 78–10 88.6% #1 2,314 5 35
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 2001 60–15 80.0% #4 2,123 5 38
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12 2002 34–10 77.3% #10 2,050 5 40
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 — — — — — — —
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25 — — — — — — —
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29 2005 0–1 0.0% — 2,020 5 40
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36 2006 53–19 73.6% #7 2,013 5 42
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36 2007 20–12 62.5% #19 1,855 5 43
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37 — — — — — — —
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44 — — — — — — —
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50 — — — — — — —
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50 — — — — — — —
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52 — — — — — — —
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54 — — — — — — —