H2H data updated: 2026-10-17 00:00 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Martina Hingis H2H: 14-11

Lindsay Davenport holds a 14–11 lead over Martina Hingis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 25 main-draw meetings, they are tied 8–8 on hard courts, while Lindsay Davenport leads 5–3 on carpet. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 2006 Indian Wells Open round of 16 6-3 1-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
14 – 11
25 main-draw meetings
Martina Hingis
SUI Age 46 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Martina Hingis #32 6-3 1-6 6-2 Lindsay Davenport #4 Match data Mar 11, 2006* R16 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Lindsay Davenport #3 2-1 (ret.) Martina Hingis #1 Match data Oct 13, 2001* SF Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Lindsay Davenport #2 6-7(4) 6-4 6-2 Martina Hingis #1 Match data Feb 4, 2001* F Pan Pacific Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Martina Hingis #1 6-3 4-6 7-5 Lindsay Davenport #2 Match data Jan 13, 2001* F Sydney International Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Lindsay Davenport #2 7-6(7) 6-4 Martina Hingis #1 Match data Nov 10, 2000* F Philadelphia Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Martina Hingis #1 6-4 4-6 7-5 Lindsay Davenport #2 Match data Oct 15, 2000* F Zurich Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Martina Hingis #1 6-3 6-2 Lindsay Davenport #2 Match data Mar 26, 2000* F Miami Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Lindsay Davenport #2 4-6 6-4 6-0 Martina Hingis #1 Match data Mar 20, 2000* F Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Lindsay Davenport #2 6-1 7-5 Martina Hingis #1 Match data Jan 30, 2000* F Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Lindsay Davenport #2 6-4 6-2 Martina Hingis #1 Match data Nov 15, 1999 F WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Lindsay Davenport #2 6-3 6-4 Martina Hingis #1 Match data Nov 14, 1999* F Philadelphia Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Lindsay Davenport #1 6-4 6-3 Martina Hingis #2 Match data Jan 17, 1999* F Sydney International Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Martina Hingis #2 7-5 6-4 4-6 6-2 Lindsay Davenport #1 Match data Nov 16, 1998 F WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Lindsay Davenport #3 6-3 7-5 Martina Hingis #1 Match data Sep 13, 1998* F US Open Grand Slam Hard
Lindsay Davenport #2 4-6 6-4 6-3 Martina Hingis #1 Match data Aug 16, 1998* F Manhattan Beach Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Martina Hingis #1 6-3 6-4 Lindsay Davenport #2 Match data Mar 5, 1998 F Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Lindsay Davenport #2 6-3 6-3 Martina Hingis #1 Match data Feb 8, 1998* F Pan Pacific Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Martina Hingis #1 7-5 6-7 7-6 Lindsay Davenport #3 Match data Nov 16, 1997* F Philadelphia Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Martina Hingis #1 6-2 6-4 Lindsay Davenport #6 Match data Sep 6, 1997* SF US Open Grand Slam Hard
Lindsay Davenport #7 6-2 4-6 6-4 Martina Hingis #1 Match data Aug 9, 1997* SF Manhattan Beach Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Martina Hingis #1 6-3 1-6 6-2 Lindsay Davenport #7 Match data Jul 26, 1997* SF Stanford Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Martina Hingis #8 6-3 6-7 6-2 Lindsay Davenport #6 Match data Nov 2, 1996* QF Chicago Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Martina Hingis #10 3-6 6-2 6-3 Lindsay Davenport #6 Match data Oct 12, 1996* SF Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Lindsay Davenport #6 4-6 6-2 6-2 Martina Hingis #23 Match data Jun 4, 1995* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Lindsay Davenport #7 6-1 3-6 6-3 Martina Hingis #87 Match data Jan 13, 1995* R16 Sydney International Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,374 711 191 78.8% 3 1 11 1 26 13 55
Martina Hingis #19 #1 6,976 2,373 516 127 80.2% 5 0 17 2 16 3 43

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Martina Hingis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1994 5–3 62.5% #87 1,595 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1995 18–12 60.0% #16 1,825 0 0
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 1996 46–16 74.2% #4 2,157 0 2
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,512 0 0 1997 72–5 93.5% #1 2,313 3 14
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 1998 60–12 83.3% #2 2,264 4 19
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,041 0 3 1999 70–12 85.4% #1 2,287 5 26
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,964 0 4 2000 78–10 88.6% #1 2,318 5 35
20 1996 47–15 75.8% #9 2,065 0 7 2001 60–15 80.0% #4 2,126 5 38
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,166 0 13 2002 34–10 77.3% #10 2,051 5 40
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,286 1 19 — — — — — — —
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,327 2 26 — — — — — — —
24 2000 57–14 80.3% #2 2,253 3 30 2005 0–1 0.0% — 2,021 5 40
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,298 3 37 2006 53–19 73.6% #7 2,018 5 42
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,165 3 37 2007 20–12 62.5% #19 1,858 5 43
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,074 3 38 — — — — — — —
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,208 3 45 — — — — — — —
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,215 3 51 — — — — — — —
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,132 3 51 — — — — — — —
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,156 3 53 — — — — — — —
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,111 3 55 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lindsay Davenport Martina Hingis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 10 7 17 58.8% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
15 1991 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 19 6 25 76.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 13 3 16 81.3%
16 1992 2 2 4 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1997 39 2 41 95.1% 11 1 12 91.7% 7 0 7 100.0% 15 2 17 88.2%
17 1993 18 8 26 69.2% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1998 31 7 38 81.6% 16 2 18 88.9% 5 1 6 83.3% 8 2 10 80.0%
18 1994 21 6 27 77.8% 12 4 16 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 1999 40 6 46 87.0% 19 2 21 90.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 3 14 78.6%
19 1995 15 8 23 65.2% 8 1 9 88.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2000 43 6 49 87.8% 12 2 14 85.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 15 1 16 93.8%
20 1996 29 6 35 82.9% 9 1 10 90.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 2001 39 7 46 84.8% 17 5 22 77.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
21 1997 36 8 44 81.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 2002 28 8 36 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0%
22 1998 43 7 50 86.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1999 33 8 41 80.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 7 0 7 100.0% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2000 41 9 50 82.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9% 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2001 51 9 60 85.0% — — — — 9 1 10 90.0% 4 0 4 100.0% 2006 33 14 47 70.2% 14 3 17 82.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0%
26 2002 21 8 29 72.4% — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 2007 13 10 23 56.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0%
27 2003 30 10 40 75.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 40 5 45 88.9% 13 3 16 81.3% 5 1 6 83.3% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 38 7 45 84.4% 11 2 13 84.6% 6 1 7 85.7% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 21 8 29 72.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 13 1 14 92.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 18 4 22 81.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 471 116 587 80.2% 106 33 139 76.3% 55 16 71 77.5% 79 26 105 75.2% — 299 76 375 79.7% 110 26 136 80.9% 27 8 35 77.1% 80 17 97 82.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lindsay Davenport Martina Hingis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1596 137.2 — — — — +29 — — 66.7% +1.72 0–2 0–1 — +0.60
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1826 156.2 — — — — -51 -101 — 54.1% +0.20 10–4 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 111.3 -2.22
15 1991 1505 103.8 — — — — +36 — — 28.6% -1.71 1–0 — — -0.02 1996 2157 176.6 — — — — -18 -319 -474 70.9% +1.71 8–6 (57%) 3–2 (60%) 106.0 -2.29
16 1992 1512 119.7 — — — — +67 0 — 31.3% -1.38 1–1 — — -0.26 1997 2313 180.8 — — — — -10 -282 -433 82.8% +2.49 20–4 (83%) 7–4 (64%) 109.7 -0.45
17 1993 1859 149.8 — — — — -28 -178 -240 61.3% +0.93 11–3 (79%) 4–4 (50%) 111.2 -0.48 1998 2264 179.3 — — — — +20 -97 -268 78.0% +2.11 11–7 (61%) 8–2 (80%) 99.7 -2.67
18 1994 2042 168.7 — — — — -27 -192 -347 69.7% +1.73 11–7 (61%) 6–5 (55%) 102.2 -2.87 1999 2287 181.2 — — — — +21 -52 — 81.3% +2.39 9–3 (75%) 9–6 (60%) 100.4 -1.78
19 1995 1964 155.2 — — — — -14 -55 -216 64.4% +1.21 10–5 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 100.2 +0.77 2000 2318 181.6 — — — — +43 -82 -241 83.9% +2.67 9–5 (64%) 5–4 (56%) 98.2 -3.02
20 1996 2066 172.6 — — — — +4 -68 -253 73.5% +1.73 6–6 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 100.5 -1.62 2001 2127 173.7 — — — — +111 +135 — 77.2% +2.15 9–5 (64%) 7–2 (78%) 99.1 -1.01
21 1997 2166 175.6 — — — — +24 -154 — 74.4% +1.95 10–10 (50%) 7–8 (47%) 94.6 +0.58 2002 2052 167.3 — — — — +74 +178 — 74.0% +1.87 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 99.3 -0.76
22 1998 2287 180.4 — — — — +50 -220 -400 75.7% +1.94 16–7 (70%) 8–5 (62%) 105.2 -2.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1999 2328 179.8 — — — — +19 -263 -303 82.2% +2.53 8–4 (67%) 7–2 (78%) 101.9 -1.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2000 2254 177.5 — — — — +40 — -106 76.8% +2.17 13–6 (68%) 8–8 (50%) 96.4 -2.76 2005 2022 100.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.01
25 2001 2298 174.7 — — — — +18 — -24 81.0% +2.19 13–4 (76%) 9–4 (69%) 103.0 -1.06 2006 2019 166.2 +3.76 +5.53 1.218 54.3% +7 +209 -3 71.3% +1.62 8–10 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 96.4 -3.22
26 2002 2166 166.9 — — — — +25 — — 71.1% +1.46 4–6 (40%) 7–5 (58%) 90.6 -0.63 2007 1859 147.6 +3.39 +4.14 1.205 54.0% +31 — +137 63.5% +1.15 3–7 (30%) 2–2 (50%) 91.3 +1.36
27 2003 2075 165.9 +4.70 +4.45 1.328 56.1% +52 +20 +133 74.6% +1.95 10–6 (63%) 5–5 (50%) 96.2 -0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 2208 171.1 +7.65 +5.05 1.482 57.9% +54 -118 +45 83.1% +2.56 7–3 (70%) 5–3 (63%) 100.2 -0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 2215 170.5 +5.92 +4.60 1.294 55.2% +26 -49 +49 79.2% +2.00 16–6 (73%) 9–7 (56%) 103.6 -1.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 2133 165.6 +4.92 +4.20 1.241 54.4% +19 — — 71.9% +1.67 4–4 (50%) 7–2 (78%) 97.4 -1.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 2157 145.6 +4.78 +3.86 1.472 58.3% +12 — — 83.9% +2.65 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — -0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 2112 144.2 +7.49 +3.10 1.375 56.0% -6 +44 — 80.0% +2.18 5–0 (100%) 1–1 — -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2375 176.6 +6.17 +4.21 1.351 56.0% +22 -122 -126 74.8% +1.90 149–78 (66%) 95–72 (57%) 101.9 -1.91 — 2373 179.5 +3.63 +5.03 1.214 54.2% +28 -50 -259 75.7% +1.99 92–57 (62%) 53–29 (65%) 103.7 -2.41

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.