H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Mary Joe Fernandez H2H: 4-4

Lindsay Davenport and Mary Joe Fernandez are tied 4–4 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 3–2 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 1999 Tokyo fourth round 6-4 6-4.

USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 4
8 main draw meetings
Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 6, 1999* Tokyo WTA 1000 R16 Carpet Lindsay Davenport #1 6-4 6-4 Mary Joe Fernandez #56 Match data
Jan 15, 1999* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #1 6-4 7-6 Mary Joe Fernandez #77 Match data
Nov 17, 1997 WTA Tour Championships WTA Finals R16 Carpet Mary Joe Fernandez #11 2-6 6-4 7-6 Lindsay Davenport #2 Match data
Mar 24, 1997* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R16 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #12 6-2 6-4 Lindsay Davenport #7 Match data
Mar 12, 1997* Indian Wells WTA 1000 SF Hard Lindsay Davenport #8 6-1 6-1 Mary Joe Fernandez #14 Match data
Jul 5, 1995* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Mary Joe Fernandez #14 7-6 6-1 Lindsay Davenport #7 Match data
Jan 26, 1994* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #19 6-2 6-7(4) 6-2 Mary Joe Fernandez #5 Match data
Feb 27, 1993* Indian Wells WTA 1000 QF Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #7 7-5 6-2 Lindsay Davenport #99 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Mary Joe Fernandez #136 #4 2,114 2,191 409 192 68.1% 0 3 0 1 3 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Mary Joe Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 1984 0–2 0.0% 1,475 0 0
13 1985 5–6 45.5% #99 1,554 0 0
14 1986 18–14 56.2% #27 1,764 0 0
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 1987 24–14 63.2% #20 1,895 0 0
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0 1988 22–11 66.7% #15 1,922 0 0
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 1989 32–15 68.1% #12 1,977 0 0
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3 1990 40–10 80.0% #4 2,123 0 2
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4 1991 47–18 72.3% #8 2,062 0 2
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 1992 47–16 74.6% #6 2,108 0 2
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12 1993 34–13 72.3% #7 2,054 0 3
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 1994 21–9 70.0% #14 1,975 0 4
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25 1995 29–11 72.5% #8 2,038 0 6
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29 1996 26–15 63.4% #16 1,926 0 6
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36 1997 39–16 70.9% #10 1,987 0 7
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36 1998 8–8 50.0% #77 1,932 0 7
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37 1999 17–13 56.7% #38 1,890 0 7
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44 2000 0–1 0.0% #136 1,869 0 7
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54