H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 14:15 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Mary Pierce H2H: 5-4

Lindsay Davenport holds a 5–4 lead over Mary Pierce in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Mary Pierce leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 2005 WTA Tour Championships semifinal 7-6(5) 7-6(6).

USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
5 4
9 main draw meetings
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 13, 2005* WTA Tour Championships WTA Finals SF Hard Mary Pierce #5 7-6(5) 7-6(6) Lindsay Davenport #1 Match data
Jun 2, 2005* Roland Garros Grand Slam QF Clay Mary Pierce #23 6-3 6-2 Lindsay Davenport #1 Match data
Sep 9, 1999* US Open Grand Slam QF Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 6-2 3-6 7-5 Mary Pierce #5 Match data
Oct 9, 1998* Filderstadt WTA 250 R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 6-1 6-3 Mary Pierce #11 Match data
Aug 9, 1998* San Diego WTA 500 F Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 6-3 6-1 Mary Pierce #16 Match data
Apr 11, 1998* Amelia Island WTA 250 SF Clay Mary Pierce #6 4-6 6-3 6-3 Lindsay Davenport #2 Match data
Apr 13, 1997* Amelia Island WTA 250 F Clay Lindsay Davenport #8 6-2 6-3 Mary Pierce #15 Match data
Nov 14, 1994 Virginia Slims Championships WTA Finals SF Carpet Lindsay Davenport #7 6-3 6-2 Mary Pierce #5 Match data
Jan 24, 1993* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Mary Pierce #12 6-3 6-0 Lindsay Davenport #135 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Mary Pierce
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54