H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Natasha Zvereva H2H: 4-1

Lindsay Davenport holds a 4–1 lead over Natasha Zvereva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 4–0 on hard courts, while Natasha Zvereva leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2000 Indian Wells third round 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Natasha Zvereva
BLR Age 55 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 13, 2000* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 6-4 6-2 Natasha Zvereva #30 Match data
Aug 15, 1998* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 QF Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 6-2 6-3 Natasha Zvereva #18 Match data
Oct 16, 1997* Zurich WTA 1000 R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #6 6-4 2-2 (ret.) Natasha Zvereva #23 Match data
May 23, 1997* Strasbourg WTA 500 R16 Clay Natasha Zvereva #45 3-6 7-6 6-2 Lindsay Davenport #5 Match data
Aug 16, 1996* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #10 7-5 6-2 Natasha Zvereva #28 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Natasha Zvereva #201 #5 1,820 2,073 388 232 62.6% 0 0 0 2 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Natasha Zvereva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 1986 4–2 66.7% #94 1,575 0 0
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0 1987 21–11 65.6% #19 1,831 0 0
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 1988 38–17 69.1% #7 1,991 0 0
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3 1989 23–17 57.5% #27 1,802 0 0
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4 1990 38–15 71.7% #12 1,955 0 2
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 1991 29–18 61.7% #21 1,912 0 2
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12 1992 32–19 62.7% #23 1,977 0 2
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 1993 37–19 66.1% #19 1,972 0 2
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25 1994 29–12 70.7% #10 1,978 0 3
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29 1995 31–17 64.6% #14 1,971 0 3
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36 1996 11–12 47.8% #57 1,877 0 3
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36 1997 25–20 55.6% #25 1,902 0 3
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37 1998 35–21 62.5% #16 1,932 0 4
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44 1999 24–19 55.8% #27 1,824 0 5
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50 2000 11–12 47.8% #78 1,759 0 5
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50 — — — — — — —
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,733 0 5
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54 — — — — — — —