H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Nathalie Dechy H2H: 8-0

Lindsay Davenport holds a 8–0 lead over Nathalie Dechy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 7–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2005 US Open fourth round 6-0 6-3.

USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
8 0
8 main draw meetings
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 6, 2005* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #1 6-0 6-3 Nathalie Dechy #15 Match data
Mar 14, 2005* Indian Wells WTA 1000 QF Hard Lindsay Davenport #1 7-6(2) 6-0 Nathalie Dechy #14 Match data
Jan 28, 2005* Australian Open Grand Slam SF Hard Lindsay Davenport #1 2-6 7-6(5) 6-4 Nathalie Dechy #25 Match data
Jan 14, 2005* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #1 6-3 6-4 Nathalie Dechy #24 Match data
Mar 15, 2004* Indian Wells WTA 1000 SF Hard Lindsay Davenport #4 6-2 7-6(4) Nathalie Dechy #28 Match data
Jun 1, 2003* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Lindsay Davenport #6 6-3 7-5 Nathalie Dechy #23 Match data
Aug 27, 1999* New Haven WTA 500 R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 6-4 6-2 Nathalie Dechy #25 Match data
Jan 15, 1997* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Lindsay Davenport #9 4-6 6-1 6-1 Nathalie Dechy #76 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Nathalie Dechy #88 #11 1,773 1,917 291 270 51.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Nathalie Dechy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0 1995 0–2 0.0% #237 1,481 0 0
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 1996 6–11 35.3% #84 1,501 0 0
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3 1997 6–11 35.3% #73 1,539 0 0
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4 1998 12–17 41.4% #50 1,619 0 0
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 1999 32–23 58.2% #25 1,790 0 0
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12 2000 28–19 59.6% #26 1,777 0 0
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 2001 21–25 45.7% #43 1,626 0 0
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25 2002 33–24 57.9% #20 1,770 0 0
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29 2003 31–18 63.3% #29 1,819 0 1
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36 2004 33–23 58.9% #21 1,810 0 1
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36 2005 40–26 60.6% #12 1,798 0 1
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37 2006 16–25 39.0% #48 1,649 0 1
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44 2007 16–19 45.7% #68 1,651 0 1
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50 2008 13–16 44.8% #69 1,670 0 1
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50 2009 4–11 26.7% #88 1,582 0 1
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54