H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Nathalie Tauziat H2H: 13-2

Lindsay Davenport holds a 13–2 lead over Nathalie Tauziat in their WTA head-to-head. Across 15 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 8–0 on hard courts and 4–0 on carpet. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2001 Los Angeles semifinal 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lindsay Davenport

USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"

H2H

13 – 2

15 main-draw meetings

Nathalie Tauziat

FRA Age 58 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

.mobile-filter-details > .mobile-filter-details__toggle { display: none; } .mobile-filter-details > .mobile-filter-details__toggle + .mobile-filter-details__fields { display: flex; flex-wrap: wrap; }

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Lindsay Davenport #3	6-1 6-2	Nathalie Tauziat #9	Match data	Aug 11, 2001*	SF	Los Angeles	Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500	Hard
Lindsay Davenport #2	7-6 6-0	Nathalie Tauziat #7	Match data	Nov 15, 1999	SF	WTA Finals	WTA Finals	Carpet
Lindsay Davenport #1	6-0 6-3	Nathalie Tauziat #8	Match data	Nov 16, 1998	QF	WTA Finals	WTA Finals	Carpet
Lindsay Davenport #2	7-6 7-5	Nathalie Tauziat #8	Match data	Oct 10, 1998*	QF	Porsche Tennis Grand Prix	Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500	Hard
Lindsay Davenport #3	6-1 6-4	Nathalie Tauziat #9	Match data	Sep 8, 1998*	R16	US Open	Grand Slam	Hard
Lindsay Davenport #2	6-4 6-3	Nathalie Tauziat #9	Match data	Aug 8, 1998*	QF	San Diego	Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500	Hard
Nathalie Tauziat #15	6-3 6-3	Lindsay Davenport #2	Match data	Jul 3, 1998*	QF	Wimbledon	Grand Slam	Grass
Lindsay Davenport #2	6-1 6-2	Nathalie Tauziat #12	Match data	Mar 23, 1998*	R16	Key Biscayne	Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000	Hard
Lindsay Davenport #3	6-3 6-3	Nathalie Tauziat #14	Match data	Nov 13, 1997*	R32	Philadelphia	Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500	Carpet
Lindsay Davenport #5	6-0 7-5	Nathalie Tauziat #17	Match data	Nov 9, 1997*	F	Chicago	Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500	Carpet
Lindsay Davenport #6	7-6 7-5	Nathalie Tauziat #22	Match data	Oct 18, 1997*	F	Zurich	Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000	Hard
Lindsay Davenport #7	6-1 3-6 6-3	Nathalie Tauziat #22	Match data	Aug 9, 1997*	QF	Manhattan Beach	Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500	Hard
Lindsay Davenport #10	6-1 6-4	Nathalie Tauziat #20	Match data	May 25, 1996*	QF	Strasbourg Open	Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250	Clay
Lindsay Davenport #13	6-0 7-5	Nathalie Tauziat #19	Match data	Mar 15, 1994*	R16	Key Biscayne	Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000	Hard
Nathalie Tauziat #16	6-3 7-6	Lindsay Davenport #28	Match data	Jun 27, 1993*	R32	Wimbledon	Grand Slam	Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	Olympics	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Lindsay Davenport	#35	#1	6,100	2,374	711	191	78.8%	3	1	11	1	26	13	55
Nathalie Tauziat	#126	#3	2,562	2,033	548	333	62.2%	0	0	1	0	3	4	8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Lindsay Davenport							Nathalie Tauziat
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
15	1991	1–2	33.3%	#348	1,504	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
16	1992	2–5	28.6%	#161	1,512	0	0	1984	0–1	0.0%	#296	1,499	0	0
17	1993	31–15	67.4%	#20	1,858	0	1	1985	3–3	50.0%	#112	1,539	0	0
18	1994	44–15	74.6%	#6	2,041	0	3	1986	12–17	41.4%	#66	1,643	0	0
19	1995	31–14	68.9%	#12	1,964	0	4	1987	32–20	61.5%	#25	1,821	0	0
20	1996	47–15	75.8%	#9	2,065	0	7	1988	31–20	60.8%	#26	1,849	0	0
21	1997	57–16	78.1%	#3	2,166	0	13	1989	32–19	62.7%	#25	1,875	0	0
22	1998	68–14	82.9%	#1	2,286	1	19	1990	46–20	69.7%	#18	1,962	0	1
23	1999	58–11	84.1%	#2	2,327	2	26	1991	38–20	65.5%	#13	1,987	0	1
24	2000	57–14	80.3%	#2	2,253	3	30	1992	39–20	66.1%	#14	1,934	0	1
25	2001	64–10	86.5%	#1	2,298	3	37	1993	41–18	69.5%	#18	1,975	0	2
26	2002	24–9	72.7%	#12	2,165	3	37	1994	29–21	58.0%	#35	1,850	0	2
27	2003	48–15	76.2%	#5	2,074	3	38	1995	27–19	58.7%	#27	1,845	0	3
28	2004	64–10	86.5%	#1	2,208	3	45	1996	30–22	57.7%	#22	1,799	0	3
29	2005	58–11	84.1%	#1	2,215	3	51	1997	40–21	65.6%	#11	1,977	0	4
30	2006	21–8	72.4%	#25	2,132	3	51	1998	41–23	64.1%	#10	2,025	0	4
31	2007	13–1	92.9%	#72	2,156	3	53	1999	37–23	61.7%	#7	1,988	0	6
32	2008	23–6	79.3%	#35	2,111	3	55	2000	36–25	59.0%	#10	1,869	0	7
33	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2001	34–21	61.8%	#13	1,864	0	8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Lindsay Davenport																	Nathalie Tauziat
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
15	1991	1	2	3	33.3%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
16	1992	2	2	4	50.0%	0	3	3	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1984	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
17	1993	18	8	26	69.2%	8	3	11	72.7%	2	2	4	50.0%	3	2	5	60.0%	1985	1	1	2	50.0%	2	2	4	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1994	21	6	27	77.8%	12	4	16	75.0%	4	1	5	80.0%	7	4	11	63.6%	1986	3	5	8	37.5%	3	4	7	42.9%	4	3	7	57.1%	2	5	7	28.6%
19	1995	15	8	23	65.2%	8	1	9	88.9%	3	1	4	75.0%	5	4	9	55.6%	1987	12	8	20	60.0%	11	5	16	68.8%	4	3	7	57.1%	5	4	9	55.6%
20	1996	29	6	35	82.9%	9	1	10	90.0%	2	2	4	50.0%	7	6	13	53.8%	1988	16	8	24	66.7%	9	6	15	60.0%	2	3	5	40.0%	4	3	7	57.1%
21	1997	36	8	44	81.8%	10	4	14	71.4%	1	1	2	50.0%	10	3	13	76.9%	1989	17	9	26	65.4%	11	5	16	68.8%	2	2	4	50.0%	2	3	5	40.0%
22	1998	43	7	50	86.0%	11	4	15	73.3%	4	1	5	80.0%	10	2	12	83.3%	1990	18	7	25	72.0%	7	4	11	63.6%	8	3	11	72.7%	13	6	19	68.4%
23	1999	33	8	41	80.5%	9	2	11	81.8%	7	0	7	100.0%	9	1	10	90.0%	1991	14	8	22	63.6%	9	4	13	69.2%	5	3	8	62.5%	10	5	15	66.7%
24	2000	41	9	50	82.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	7	2	9	77.8%	8	1	9	88.9%	1992	14	8	22	63.6%	9	5	14	64.3%	8	3	11	72.7%	8	4	12	66.7%
25	2001	51	9	60	85.0%	—	—	—	—	9	1	10	90.0%	4	0	4	100.0%	1993	20	8	28	71.4%	4	3	7	57.1%	8	3	11	72.7%	9	4	13	69.2%
26	2002	21	8	29	72.4%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	3	1	4	75.0%	1994	10	9	19	52.6%	5	4	9	55.6%	6	3	9	66.7%	8	5	13	61.5%
27	2003	30	10	40	75.0%	10	3	13	76.9%	4	2	6	66.7%	4	0	4	100.0%	1995	9	9	18	50.0%	7	4	11	63.6%	9	2	11	81.8%	2	4	6	33.3%
28	2004	40	5	45	88.9%	13	3	16	81.3%	5	1	6	83.3%	6	1	7	85.7%	1996	11	9	20	55.0%	9	6	15	60.0%	9	3	12	75.0%	1	4	5	20.0%
29	2005	38	7	45	84.4%	11	2	13	84.6%	6	1	7	85.7%	3	1	4	75.0%	1997	12	8	20	60.0%	6	4	10	60.0%	11	2	13	84.6%	11	7	18	61.1%
30	2006	21	8	29	72.4%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1998	15	9	24	62.5%	3	5	8	37.5%	9	2	11	81.8%	14	7	21	66.7%
31	2007	13	1	14	92.9%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1999	7	9	16	43.8%	5	5	10	50.0%	11	3	14	78.6%	14	6	20	70.0%
32	2008	18	4	22	81.8%	4	1	5	80.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	2000	14	11	25	56.0%	5	4	9	55.6%	4	3	7	57.1%	13	7	20	65.0%
33	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2001	19	11	30	63.3%	2	4	6	33.3%	9	2	11	81.8%	4	4	8	50.0%
Career	—	471	116	587	80.2%	106	33	139	76.3%	55	16	71	77.5%	79	26	105	75.2%	—	212	137	349	60.7%	107	75	182	58.8%	109	43	152	71.7%	120	78	198	60.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Lindsay Davenport																Nathalie Tauziat
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
15	1991	1505	103.8	—	—	—	—	+36	—	—	28.6%	-1.71	1–0	—	—	-0.02	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
16	1992	1512	119.7	—	—	—	—	+67	0	—	31.3%	-1.38	1–1	—	—	-0.26	1984	1500	112.8	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-4.50	—	—	—	-0.27
17	1993	1859	149.8	—	—	—	—	-28	-178	-240	61.3%	+0.93	11–3 (79%)	4–4 (50%)	111.2	-0.48	1985	1540	107.2	—	—	—	—	—	+22	—	46.7%	0.00	2–1 (67%)	1–2 (33%)	101.7	+0.17
18	1994	2041	168.7	—	—	—	—	-27	-191	-346	69.7%	+1.73	11–7 (61%)	6–5 (55%)	102.2	-2.86	1986	1643	133.1	—	—	—	—	-35	-75	-21	46.4%	-0.09	3–8 (27%)	3–3 (50%)	98.0	-0.66
19	1995	1964	155.1	—	—	—	—	-15	-55	-216	64.4%	+1.21	10–5 (67%)	1–4 (20%)	100.2	+0.77	1987	1821	143.9	—	—	—	—	-37	-85	-163	55.4%	+0.15	14–5 (74%)	5–2 (71%)	112.3	-1.28
20	1996	2066	172.6	—	—	—	—	+4	-68	-253	73.5%	+1.73	6–6 (50%)	10–8 (56%)	100.5	-1.62	1988	1850	146.7	—	—	—	—	+37	-107	-227	56.3%	+0.59	12–5 (71%)	6–4 (60%)	105.7	-1.09
21	1997	2166	175.6	—	—	—	—	+24	-154	—	74.4%	+1.95	10–10 (50%)	7–8 (47%)	94.6	+0.58	1989	1876	150.1	—	—	—	—	+23	-64	-230	57.9%	+0.68	10–4 (71%)	9–5 (64%)	106.8	-2.99
22	1998	2287	180.4	—	—	—	—	+50	-220	-395	75.7%	+1.94	16–7 (70%)	8–5 (62%)	105.2	-2.47	1990	1962	157.1	—	—	—	—	+20	-109	-164	63.2%	+0.99	16–4 (80%)	4–8 (33%)	104.4	-0.16
23	1999	2328	179.8	—	—	—	—	+19	-263	-303	82.2%	+2.53	8–4 (67%)	7–2 (78%)	101.9	-1.25	1991	1987	160.0	—	—	—	—	+41	-51	-179	61.7%	+0.77	11–5 (69%)	8–8 (50%)	102.2	-2.67
24	2000	2254	177.5	—	—	—	—	+41	—	-106	76.8%	+2.17	13–6 (68%)	8–8 (50%)	96.4	-2.76	1992	1935	154.0	—	—	—	—	+33	-15	+4	61.8%	+0.83	12–6 (67%)	7–5 (58%)	102.0	-0.30
25	2001	2298	174.7	—	—	—	—	+17	—	-24	81.0%	+2.19	13–4 (76%)	9–4 (69%)	103.0	-1.06	1993	1976	158.3	—	—	—	—	+42	-98	+43	62.9%	+0.80	13–5 (72%)	6–6 (50%)	102.3	+0.82
26	2002	2166	166.9	—	—	—	—	+25	—	—	71.1%	+1.46	4–6 (40%)	7–5 (58%)	90.6	-0.63	1994	1851	144.9	—	—	—	—	+28	-21	+122	56.9%	+0.60	8–8 (50%)	5–6 (45%)	93.9	+0.62
27	2003	2075	165.9	+4.70	+4.45	1.328	56.1%	+52	+20	+133	74.6%	+1.95	10–6 (63%)	5–5 (50%)	96.2	-0.74	1995	1845	146.3	—	—	—	—	-43	+7	+204	57.1%	+0.38	7–6 (54%)	3–4 (43%)	98.3	-1.26
28	2004	2208	171.1	+7.65	+5.05	1.482	57.9%	+54	-118	+45	83.1%	+2.56	7–3 (70%)	5–3 (63%)	100.2	-0.46	1996	1800	152.0	—	—	—	—	-33	+40	+313	58.3%	+0.73	6–10 (38%)	7–1 (88%)	97.2	-1.06
29	2005	2215	170.5	+5.92	+4.60	1.294	55.2%	+26	-49	+49	79.2%	+2.00	16–6 (73%)	9–7 (56%)	103.6	-1.58	1997	1977	157.1	—	—	—	—	-43	-149	+209	60.7%	+0.51	15–8 (65%)	12–7 (63%)	105.5	-0.76
30	2006	2133	165.6	+4.92	+4.20	1.241	54.4%	+19	—	—	71.9%	+1.67	4–4 (50%)	7–2 (78%)	97.4	-1.47	1998	2026	161.2	—	—	—	—	0	-297	+207	58.7%	+0.74	16–6 (73%)	7–7 (50%)	101.5	+0.49
31	2007	2157	145.6	+4.78	+3.86	1.472	58.3%	+12	—	—	83.9%	+2.65	3–0 (100%)	1–1	—	-0.41	1999	1988	153.0	—	—	—	—	+7	-271	+186	58.7%	+0.52	13–12 (52%)	5–7 (42%)	95.8	+0.18
32	2008	2112	144.2	+7.49	+3.10	1.375	56.0%	-6	+44	—	80.0%	+2.18	5–0 (100%)	1–1	—	-0.18	2000	1870	151.2	—	—	—	—	+43	-148	+295	56.9%	+0.40	12–10 (55%)	9–3 (75%)	99.7	+4.24
33	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2001	1865	149.8	—	—	—	—	0	-190	+392	57.1%	+0.37	15–10 (60%)	14–4 (78%)	105.2	+2.32
Career	—	2375	176.5	+6.17	+4.21	1.351	56.0%	+22	-122	-126	74.8%	+1.90	149–78 (66%)	95–72 (57%)	101.9	-1.91	—	2034	158.4	—	—	—	—	+9	-87	+99	58.5%	+0.58	185–113 (62%)	111–82 (58%)	106.0	-0.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Lindsay Davenport's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Venus Williams	14	13	27	Jul 3, 2005	H2H
Martina Hingis	14	11	25	Mar 11, 2006	H2H
Amélie Mauresmo	14	4	18	Sep 23, 2006	H2H
Kim Clijsters	8	9	17	Jun 28, 2005	H2H
Conchita Martínez	8	8	16	Mar 5, 2005	H2H

Nathalie Tauziat's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Steffi Graf	0	21	21	Nov 14, 1998	H2H
Lindsay Davenport	2	13	15	Aug 11, 2001	H2H
Zina Garrison	3	10	13	Nov 14, 1996	H2H
Anke Huber	8	4	12	Mar 25, 2001	H2H
Natasha Zvereva	6	6	12	Jun 20, 1999	H2H