H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Nicole Pratt H2H: 5-0

Lindsay Davenport holds a 5–0 lead over Nicole Pratt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 3–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2004 Charleston fourth round 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Nicole Pratt
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 16, 2004* Charleston WTA 1000 R16 Clay Lindsay Davenport #4 6-1 6-1 Nicole Pratt #49 Match data
Apr 17, 2003* Amelia Island WTA 500 R32 Clay Lindsay Davenport #5 6-1 6-0 Nicole Pratt #48 Match data
Jan 9, 2003* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Lindsay Davenport #12 6-3 6-3 Nicole Pratt #48 Match data
Mar 10, 2001* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 6-2 6-1 Nicole Pratt #66 Match data
Jul 28, 2000* Stanford WTA 500 R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 6-2 6-4 Nicole Pratt #50 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Nicole Pratt #1,043 #35 924 1,764 156 217 41.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Nicole Pratt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 1990 1–1 50.0% #201 1,497 0 0
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3 1991 1–7 12.5% #201 1,469 0 0
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4 1992 3–3 50.0% #203 1,491 0 0
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 1993 2–5 28.6% #172 1,486 0 0
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12 1994 2–5 28.6% #224 1,465 0 0
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 1995 0–2 0.0% #214 1,451 0 0
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25 1996 0–2 0.0% #194 1,434 0 0
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29 1997 5–4 55.6% #110 1,494 0 0
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36 1998 4–13 23.5% #113 1,464 0 0
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36 1999 15–17 46.9% #56 1,598 0 0
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37 2000 16–23 41.0% #54 1,621 0 0
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44 2001 22–23 48.9% #51 1,704 0 0
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50 2002 23–20 53.5% #48 1,719 0 0
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50 2003 17–23 42.5% #53 1,646 0 0
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52 2004 19–21 47.5% #50 1,604 0 1
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54 2005 8–17 32.0% #126 1,544 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2006 8–12 40.0% #77 1,546 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2007 10–16 38.5% #70 1,566 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2008 0–3 0.0% #1043 1,545 0 1